Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Defoliation lowered juice soluble solids by 0.7°Brix versus control in both cultivars.

A claim from POST-VERAISON MECHANICAL LEAF REMOVAL DELAYS BERRY RIPENING ON 'SANGIOVESE' AND 'MONTEPULCIANO' GRAPEVINES · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation lowered juice soluble solids by 0.7°Brix versus control in both cultivars.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
juice soluble solids concentratione0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
-0.7°Brixe0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowered juice soluble solids concentration (-0.7°Brix in comparison to control in both cultivars).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1569
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359

Title

POST-VERAISON MECHANICAL LEAF REMOVAL DELAYS BERRY RIPENING ON 'SANGIOVESE' AND 'MONTEPULCIANO' GRAPEVINES

V. Lanari; T. Lattanzi; L. Borghesi; et al. Acta Horticulturae 2013. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2013.978.38

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-cf6adb9cf66189afbba72aefc95c70349ed2ae7045258dc33fa2bcbf5b0d1b2a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.