Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha significantly maximized test weight (38.30 g) compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume4 - Material
- DBW-187e4
- Treatment
- Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/hae1
- Outcome
- Test weighte2
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 38.30 ge2
- Comparator
- other treatmentse3
- Setting
- Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHUATS, Prayagraj (U.P)e0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A field experiment was conducted during Rabi 2021-20222 at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHUATS, Prayagraj (U.P)”
e1“application of Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha was recorded significantly maximum”
e2“Test weight (38.30 g)”
e3“as compared to other treatments”
e4“Variety of wheat DBW-187”
Title
Effect of Nitrogen and Sulphur on Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Koppu Ghanasai; Rajesh Singh; Gurujala Bhanuteja; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2022. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1131195
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha significantly maximized the number of grains per spike (47.34) compared with other treatments.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha significantly maximized grain yield (6.14 t/ha) compared with other treatments.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha significantly maximized straw yield (9.52 t/ha) compared with other treatments.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha significantly maximized gross returns (Rs.99911.66/ha) compared with other treatments.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha significantly maximized net return (Rs.67591.73/ha) compared with other treatments.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen 120 kg/ha + Sulphur 45 kg/ha significantly maximized the benefit cost ratio (2.09) compared with other treatments.