Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T9 had highest trunk girth increment, 0.41 cm.

A claim from Effect of Fruitlet Thinning on Apple Production and Quality under High Density Plantation · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had highest trunk girth increment, 0.41 cm.

Treatment
T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm)e0
Outcome
trunk girth incremente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.41 cme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm) demonstrated significant results, with the highest trunk girth increment (0.41 cm), annual shoot extension growth (65.46 cm), leaf area (34.71 cm2), fruit drop (39.26%), and the least reduction in return bloom (52.22%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–706
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36

Title

Effect of Fruitlet Thinning on Apple Production and Quality under High Density Plantation

Mehvish Bashir; Rifat Bhat; M. K. Sharma; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i103108

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-d76043a8f124d46081ee4b17da0149e28646ae7819ef26f5b26e38eb2bbd382b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.