Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Fruitlet Thinning on Apple Production and Quality under High Density Plantation

Mehvish Bashir; Rifat Bhat; M. K. Sharma; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study, conducted within the Experimental Block of the Division of Fruit Science at SKUAST-K, Shalimar, India, was aimed to thin 5-year-old Fuji Zehn Aztec apple plants. The research was carried out during the years 2020 and 2021and implemented a Randomized Complete Block Design with 11 treatments, including control and various other thinning methods. Chemical and hand thinning were practised at the 12 mm king fruitlet diameter stage. Among the treatments, T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm) demonstrated significant results, with the highest trunk girth increment (0.41 cm), annual shoot extension growth (65.46 cm), leaf area (34.71 cm2), fruit drop (39.26%), and the least reduction in return bloom (52.22%). Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87). However, the highest yield (21.97 kg/tree), yield efficiency (1.50 kg/cm2), fruit firmness (8.36 kg/cm2), hue angle (68.57°), and acidity (0.59%) were recorded in the control group. Notably, T1 (Hand thinning @ 2 fruitlets retained per cluster) achieved the highest fruit retention (97.97%) and the maximum leaf-to-fruit ratio (27.50). These findings shed light on the potential benefits and trade-offs associated with different fruitlet thinning methods in high-density apple plantations. Understanding these effects can aid orchard management practices to optimize both production and fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had highest trunk girth increment, 0.41 cm.

Treatment
T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm)e0
Outcome
trunk girth incremente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.41 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm) demonstrated significant results, with the highest trunk girth increment (0.41 cm), annual shoot extension growth (65.46 cm), leaf area (34.71 cm2), fruit drop (39.26%), and the least reduction in return bloom (52.22%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had highest annual shoot extension growth, 65.46 cm.

Treatment
T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm)e0
Outcome
annual shoot extension growthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
65.46 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm) demonstrated significant results, with the highest trunk girth increment (0.41 cm), annual shoot extension growth (65.46 cm), leaf area (34.71 cm2), fruit drop (39.26%), and the least reduction in return bloom (52.22%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had highest leaf area, 34.71 cm2.

Treatment
T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm)e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
34.71 cm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm) demonstrated significant results, with the highest trunk girth increment (0.41 cm), annual shoot extension growth (65.46 cm), leaf area (34.71 cm2), fruit drop (39.26%), and the least reduction in return bloom (52.22%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had highest fruit drop, 39.26%.

Treatment
T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm)e0
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm) demonstrated significant results, with the highest trunk girth increment (0.41 cm), annual shoot extension growth (65.46 cm), leaf area (34.71 cm2), fruit drop (39.26%), and the least reduction in return bloom (52.22%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 had least reduction in return bloom, 52.22%.

Treatment
T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm)e0
Outcome
return bloome0
Direction
least reductione0
Value
52.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T9 (NAA+BA@15+140ppm) demonstrated significant results, with the highest trunk girth increment (0.41 cm), annual shoot extension growth (65.46 cm), leaf area (34.71 cm2), fruit drop (39.26%), and the least reduction in return bloom (52.22%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum fruit length, 79.98 mm.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
79.98 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum fruit diameter, 89.00 mm.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
fruit diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
89.00 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum fruit weight, 224.90 g.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
224.90 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum fruit volume, 197.86 cm3.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
fruit volumee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
197.86 cm3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum Soluble Solid concentration, 15.87%.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
Soluble Solid concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
15.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum SSC : acidity, 40.08.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
SSC : aciditye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40.08e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum total sugar content, 11.07%.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
total sugar contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
11.07%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum anthocyanin content, 7.14 mg/100g.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
7.14 mg/100ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum ascorbic acid content, 6.94 mg/100g.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.94 mg/100ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 gave maximum organoleptic rating score, 4.87.

Treatment
T9e0
Outcome
organoleptic rating scoree0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.87e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, T9 resulted in maximum fruit length (79.98 mm), fruit diameter (89.00 mm), fruit weight (224.90 g), fruit volume (197.86 cm3), Soluble Solid concentration (15.87%), SSC : acidity (40.08), total sugar content (11.07%), anthocyanin content (7.14 mg/100g), ascorbic acid content (6.94 mg/100g), and received the highest organoleptic rating score (4.87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had highest yield, 21.97 kg/tree.

Treatment
control groupe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.97 kg/treee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the highest yield (21.97 kg/tree), yield efficiency (1.50 kg/cm2), fruit firmness (8.36 kg/cm2), hue angle (68.57°), and acidity (0.59%) were recorded in the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had highest yield efficiency, 1.50 kg/cm2.

Treatment
control groupe0
Outcome
yield efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.50 kg/cm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the highest yield (21.97 kg/tree), yield efficiency (1.50 kg/cm2), fruit firmness (8.36 kg/cm2), hue angle (68.57°), and acidity (0.59%) were recorded in the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had highest fruit firmness, 8.36 kg/cm2.

Treatment
control groupe0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.36 kg/cm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the highest yield (21.97 kg/tree), yield efficiency (1.50 kg/cm2), fruit firmness (8.36 kg/cm2), hue angle (68.57°), and acidity (0.59%) were recorded in the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had highest hue angle, 68.57°.

Treatment
control groupe0
Outcome
hue anglee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
68.57°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the highest yield (21.97 kg/tree), yield efficiency (1.50 kg/cm2), fruit firmness (8.36 kg/cm2), hue angle (68.57°), and acidity (0.59%) were recorded in the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had highest acidity, 0.59%.

Treatment
control groupe0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the highest yield (21.97 kg/tree), yield efficiency (1.50 kg/cm2), fruit firmness (8.36 kg/cm2), hue angle (68.57°), and acidity (0.59%) were recorded in the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

N-benzyladenine · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

75 papers: 57 positive, 18 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.