Claim · model-written summary
ICI 8532 IT was not injured by imazethapyr or thifensulfuron with terbufos.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- ICI 8532 ITe0
- Treatment
- imazethapyr or thifensulfuron and terbufose0
- Outcome
- not injurede0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ICI 8532 IT corn hybrid was not injured by the combination treatment of imazethapyr or thifensulfuron and terbufos.”
Title
Chae Soon Kwon; James J. Kells; Donald Penner Weed Technology 1995. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00024076
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect PBO with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron injured Northrup King 9283 corn.
- Observation Great Lakes 584 corn was less sensitive than Northrup King 9283.
- Intervention effect Pioneer 3377 IR resisted nicosulfuron or primisulfuron plus PBO.
- Intervention effect Pioneer 3377 IR resisted imazethapyr plus PBO despite prior terbufos.
- Intervention effect ICI 8532 IT, ICI 8532 and Pioneer 3377 were injured by combinations of nicosulfuron or primisulfuron, terbufos and PBO.
- Intervention effect Pioneer 3377 IR and Ciba 4393 RSC resisted sulfonylurea and imidazolinone in field studies.
- Intervention effect Chlorimuron plus terbufos injured four corn hybrids.
- Intervention effect Chlorimuron plus terbufos did not injure Pioneer 3377 IR or Ciba 4393 RSC.
- Intervention effect Thifensulfuron with PBO injured Elgin 87 soybean.
- Intervention effect W20 soybean tolerated thifensulfuron with PBO.
- Intervention effect Imazethapyr with PBO did not affect Elgin 87 soybean growth.