Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Urea performed better than other fertilizer forms for grain yield.

A claim from The effect of top dressing fertilizer forms applied at different periods on yield and some yield components in durum wheat varieties · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea performed better than other fertilizer forms for grain yield.

Treatment
urea fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other fertilizer formse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of urea fertilizer is better than other fertilizer forms in terms of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1043
e1

“in Burgos, Eyyubi and Hasanbey durum wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548

Title

The effect of top dressing fertilizer forms applied at different periods on yield and some yield components in durum wheat varieties

Ugur Bilge; Kerim Mesut Çimrin Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 2025. doi:10.37908/mkutbd.1546080

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-d8ca06c714df74f0aa58120905ee256044b9d593e820d849f1eb67fa8ce88e2e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 46 positive, 10 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.