Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined millet and wheat grain yield under T6 reached 5582 kg/ha.

A claim from Canopy temperature, excised leaf water retention, productivity and quality of wheat as affected by various nutrient sources in Pearl millet-wheat cropping system · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined millet and wheat grain yield under T6 reached 5582 kg/ha.

Taxon
pearl millet and wheatCenchrus americanusTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
50 % RD-NP + 50 % N through FYM in pearl millet and 100 % RD-NP in wheate0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
5582 kg/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield of both pearl millet and wheat (5582 kg/ha) in pearl millet-wheat cropping system was obtained with the application of 50 % RD-NP + 50 % N through FYM in pearl millet and 100 % RD-NP in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–990

Title

Canopy temperature, excised leaf water retention, productivity and quality of wheat as affected by various nutrient sources in Pearl millet-wheat cropping system

Babli Babli; Pawan Kumar; R. K. Nanwal Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2017. doi:10.31018/jans.v9i2.1284

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-defd7ec6249abfbdad1019f9ad57342df567b733857292211a2859ea8ede92e4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

3 of 6 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.