Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat grain yield was significantly higher (33.33 q/ha) under the recommended NPK plus zinc treatment than under other treatments.

A claim from On-farm crop response to plant nutrients in pre-dominant cropping systems · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was significantly higher (33.33 q/ha) under the recommended NPK plus zinc treatment than under other treatments.

Treatment
recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basise1
Outcome
yield of wheat graine3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
33.33 q/hae3
Comparator
other treatmentse3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“recommended dose of N, P2O5 and K2O (50:25:25 kg/ha for Pearlmillet and 120:60:40 kg/ha for wheat) along with micronutrient on soil test basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–669
e3

“The same treatment accrued significantly higher yield of wheat grain (33.33 q/ha) and straw (52.01 q/ha) as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1092

Title

On-farm crop response to plant nutrients in pre-dominant cropping systems

P. P. Chaudhari; J. S. Kumbhar; US Surve; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e4f7a7856d6aefba6b774aaa806368683132416245bbdd2b067e36f0ebf53a26 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

248 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.