Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined biofertilizer and potassium treatment gave significantly higher straw yield.

A claim from Influence of Bio-fertilizers and Potassium Levels on Growth and Yield of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined biofertilizer and potassium treatment gave significantly higher straw yield.

Taxon
Pearl MilletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
Azospirillum + Azotobacter 25 g/kg + Potassium 50 kg/hae0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.57 t/hae0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Azospirillum + Azotobacter 25 g/kg + Potassium 50 kg/ha resulted in significantly higher plant height (150.25 cm), number of leaves/plant (12.65), plant dry weight (17.19 g/plant), number of ears/hill (2.60), number of grains/ear (2420.73), test weight (9.45 g), grain yield (3.16 t/ha), straw yield (7.57 t/ha). Harvest index (29.40), gross returns(Rs.79,000/ha), net returns(Rs.48,878.20/ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.62) as compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1494
t0

“Pearl Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85

Title

Influence of Bio-fertilizers and Potassium Levels on Growth and Yield of Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.)

Gowriraja Gayethri; C. Umesha; Bodapati Keerthi; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1731038

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-df2e8756c6cbb7038467f98d8d469068d561be47133ea0656f5a201f1ed55d95 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Azospirillum · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

potassium · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Results differ

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.