Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fruit cluster thinning raised soluble solid content relative to no thinning.

A claim from Laborsaving Effect and Fruit Characteristics of Grape ‘Campbell Early’ According to Pedicel Thinning · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit cluster thinning raised soluble solid content relative to no thinning.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
fruit cluster thinninge0
Outcome
soluble solid content (SSC)e0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
none-fruit cluster thinninge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“the soluble solid content (SSC) was high and titratable acidity (TA) was low in the fruit cluster thinning fruits than in the none-fruit cluster thinning fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–947
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53

Title

Laborsaving Effect and Fruit Characteristics of Grape ‘Campbell Early’ According to Pedicel Thinning

Su Jin Kim; Seo Jun Park; Sang-Wook Koh; et al. Korean Journal of Plant Resources 2015. doi:10.7732/kjpr.2015.28.2.290

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e14457526b5538ea6e2fcddbe27cc64a217bb051051a08006555874d4f46042b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

cluster · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Neither leaf nor cluster shading alone affected tartrate accumulation.

    The Effects of Leaf and Cluster Shading on the Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes and on Fruit and Wine Sensory Properties · 1990

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Cluster thinning increased pruning, cluster and berry weights.

    A Five-year Study on the Effect of Cluster Thinning on Yield and Fruit Composition of `Chambourcin' Grapevines · 2006

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Cluster thinning increased linalool concentration by 28.6% versus control at maturity.

    Influence of cluster thinning and girdling on aroma composition in ‘Jumeigui’ table grape · 2020 · compared with control

    Same direction

  4. positive
    UV light exposure of grape clusters significantly increased resveratrol level in Cynthiana and Noble wine produced in 1994.

    Effect of Variety, Ultraviolet Light Exposure, and Enological Methods on thetrans-Resveratrol Level of Wine · 1999

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Brushing the flower clusters at full bloom significantly decreased berry number, weight and cluster compactness compared with untreated vines.

    Effect of berry Thinning, CPPU spraying and pinching on cluster and berry quality of two grapevine cultivars · 2009 · compared with untreated one

    Same direction

  6. positive
    The streptomycin and GA3 sequence produced commercially acceptable grape clusters weighing 476 g.

    Streptomycin-induced Seedlessness in the Grape Cultivar Rubi (Italia Red) · 1996

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Individually tissue-wrapped grape clusters lost weight at a lower rate than either paper-lined or paper-curtained L.A. lugs.

    Conduction Cooling of Table Grapes · 1964 · compared with L.A. lug with paper liner or the L.A. lug with paper curtain

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Removing 25% of the apical cluster significantly decreased cluster compactness.

    Effect of Some Fruit Improving Treatments on Ruby and Thompson Seedless Grapevines Productivity · 2010

    Same direction

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

pruning · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Vine thinning increased fruit clusters per shoot to 1.5–1.75 versus 0.8 in control.

    Growth and Fruit Characteristics of Grape 'Campbell Early' by Securing Planting Distance · 2017 · compared with control

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Peduncle girdling stopped berry solute accumulation.

    Loss of rachis cell viability is associated with ripening disorders in grapes · 2010

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Girdling had no marked effect on organic acid accumulation in berries.

    Assimilate transport in grapevines -effect of phloem disruption · 2001

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Total carbon invested in fruit, canes, and leaves was similar across pruning treatments.

    Photosynthetic Physiology of Spur Pruned and Minimal Pruned Grapevines · 1992

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Defoliation lowered arginine concentration in mature fruit.

    Effects of Defoliation, Gibberellic Acid and 4-Chlorophenoxyacetic Acid on Growth and Composition of Thompson Seedless Grape Berries · 1980 · compared with control vines

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Mechanical pre-flowering leaf removal at high intensity produced fewer berries per cluster than manual leaf removal.

    Mechanisation of pre-flowering leaf removal under the temperate climate conditions of Switzerland · 2023 · compared with manual LR

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Leaf removal between the growing season and the beginning of acclimation decreased metabolite concentration in grapevine buds and canes.

    Physiological impacts of early defoliation on the cold hardiness of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) 'Sultana' · 2020 · compared with control

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    A reduction of cluster compactness from defoliation before flowering could not be determined in Riesling.

    Investigations into the effect of pre-bloom defoliation on quality and yield of organically grown `Riesling` grapes as well as `Zweigelt` grapes grown according to integrated plant protection guidelines · 2015

    Opposite direction

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.