Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium deficiency reduced HCl soluble calcium in seed from 0.06 to 0.03 percent.

A claim from Physiological Studies on Fructification of Peanut : 9. The influence of mineral deficiency in the fruiting zone on the fruit production and chemical composition of peanut. · 1963

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium deficiency reduced HCl soluble calcium in seed from 0.06 to 0.03 percent.

Treatment
calcium deficiencye0
Outcome
HCl soluble calcium in shell and in seede0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
0.03 percentagese0
Qualifier
0.06e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–49
e0

“calcium deficiency had the greatest effect on the contents of HCl soluble calcium in shell and in seed, reducing them from 0.24 and 0.06 to 0.05 and 0.03 percentages respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–951

Title

Physiological Studies on Fructification of Peanut : 9. The influence of mineral deficiency in the fruiting zone on the fruit production and chemical composition of peanut.

Susumu MIZUNO Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1963. doi:10.1626/jcs.32.14

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e17ee7e8a73ea4b4a68890df7e66fc479b207828d3c325e671d5fc1585addd1c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.