Intervention effectmodel-written summary

More calcium fertilizer increased soil calcium on Greenville and Tifton soils.

A claim from Response of Early Bunch Peanuts to Calcium and Potassium Fertilization1 · 1979

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More calcium fertilizer increased soil calcium on Greenville and Tifton soils.

Taxon
PeanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Ca fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil Cae0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Greenville and Tifton soilse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased Ca fertilization increased soil Ca on Greenville and Tifton soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1039
t0

“Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31

Title

Response of Early Bunch Peanuts to Calcium and Potassium Fertilization1

M. E. Walker; Randel A. Flowers; R. J. Henning; et al. Peanut Science 1979. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-6-2-14

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e450d0ce26e42d7fe7da10f4d212109675978d6ce1b2f861cbf395b556f8ac15 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 147 positive, 6 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

144 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.