Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bio-fertilizer with Mo increased peanut yield by 2.95% over inoculation alone.

A claim from Study on Effects of Co-inoculation of Peanut Rhizobia and Mo,P,N Fertilizer on the Yield of Peanut · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizer with Mo increased peanut yield by 2.95% over inoculation alone.

Treatment
bio-fertilizer and Moe0
Interactor
peanut rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
yield of peanute0
Direction
in creasede0
Value
2.95%e0
Comparator
only inoculating peanut rhizobiae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of bio-fertilizer and Mo, bio-fertilizer and P,and bio-fertilizer and N applied in creased yield of peanut by 2.95%,6.15%,3.65% than only inoculating peanut rhizobia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–602

Title

Study on Effects of Co-inoculation of Peanut Rhizobia and Mo,P,N Fertilizer on the Yield of Peanut

Jiaxi Tao Hubei nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e2450b554ff22c8092d17aa46fc97c4517949d11e0fc313c403e67994d005385 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

molybdenum atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

221 papers: 198 positive, 23 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

212 papers more in this group

See all 221 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.