Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NTe increased wheat grain yield significantly relative to CT.

A claim from Wheat yield and grain quality as affected by tillage, sowing time and nitrogen fertilization under rainfed Mediterranean conditions · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NTe increased wheat grain yield significantly relative to CT.

Treatment
NTee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5
e0

“No tillage systems (NTc and NTe) significantly increased grain yield compared to CT treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–627

Title

Wheat yield and grain quality as affected by tillage, sowing time and nitrogen fertilization under rainfed Mediterranean conditions

Gaetano Amato; Dario Giambalvo; Luigi Stringi; et al. Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) 2004

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e3101f184ecf89e153d711a83e8d25c2e657d1c1db51896c4b54b6b60ef95d42 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

462 papers: 266 positive, 196 negative or no effect

265 papers in the same direction as this claim · 191 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Late sowing reduced spikes per unit area and grain yield.

    Straw Production and Grain Yield Relationships in Winter Wheat · 2001

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Late sowing with high temperature and drought gave lower dry matter production.

    High temperature combined with drought affect rainfed spring wheat and barley in South-Eastern Russia: I. Phenology and growth · 2012

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Each 1-week delay in sowing after 8 March reduced grain yield by 0.45 t/ha.

    Optimising grain yield and grazing potential of crops across Australia’s high-rainfall zone: a simulation analysis. 1. Wheat · 2015

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Each week of sowing delay reduced spring-cultivar grain yield by 6%.

    The effect of time of sowing on the grain yield of irrigated wheat in the Namoi Valley, New South Wales · 1983

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Changing the sowing or transplanting date did not significantly affect rice and wheat yield.

    Attribution of yield change for rice-wheat rotation system in China to climate change, cultivars and agronomic management in the past three decades · 2015

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Late planting reduced wheat grain yield by a maximum of 53.75% relative to normal planting.

    Effect of temperature on development and grain formation in spring wheat. · 2010 · compared with normal planting

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Late sowing reduced spike length by 13%.

    Evaluation of Physiological and Morphological Traits for Improving Spring Wheat Adaptation to Terminal Heat Stress · 2021 · compared with timely sowing

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Delayed sowing decreased grain yield.

    Effect of sowing date and seed rate on crop development and grain production of winter wheat. · 1977

    Opposite direction

453 papers more in this group

See all 462 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    No N application at tillering stage decreased spikes number per m2 and seeds per spike.

    Wheat yield and grain protein response to nitrogen amount and timing. · 2011

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Grain yield under stress during tillering and jointing was 27% lower than under the nonstressed treatment I‐1.

    Winter Wheat Response to Nitrogen and Irrigation · 1988 · compared with nonstressed (I‐1)

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    NT likely decreased wheat yield.

    The impacts of conservation agriculture on crop yield in China depend on specific practices, crops and cropping regions · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Tillage treatments had no residual effect on subsequent sunflower and wheat yields.

    Tillage and Residue Effects on Wheat, Sorghum, and Sunflower Grown in Rotation · 1984

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage system had no significant wheat yield effect from 1977 to 2016.

    Long-term effects of crop succession, soil tillage and climate on wheat yield and soil properties · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Wheat grain yield was unaffected by tillage and cover crop management.

    Crop and cattle responses to tillage systems for integrated crop–livestock production in the Southern Piedmont, USA · 2007

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Reduced tillage decreased wheat yield by 14%.

    Tillage effects on weed communities in an organic winter wheat–sunflower–spelt cropping sequence · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    RB had no significant effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.