Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher French bean plant height, branches and leaf area.

A claim from Influence of conservation agriculture and organic nutrient management on growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher French bean plant height, branches and leaf area.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153

Title

Influence of conservation agriculture and organic nutrient management on growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system

VM Chandrikapure; US Surve; SS Ilhe; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i8sj.1373

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e351819cedb374559b52cdf418e2fdbaac28745da787553d9e20156b32db40da · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

organic · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 9 positive, 13 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.