Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Influence of conservation agriculture and organic nutrient management on growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system

VM Chandrikapure; US Surve; SS Ilhe; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment on “Influence of conservation agriculture and organic nutrient management on soil health and productivity of soybean – French bean cropping system” was conducted at the All India Coordinated Research Project on Integrated Farming Research System, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri (M.S.) during two consecutive years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The experiment was laid out in split plot design during kharif season and split-split plot design during rabi season with three replications. Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management. In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher soybean plant height, branches and leaf area.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher soybean root nodule number and dry matter.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher soybean pod number, seeds per pod and pod weight.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher soybean seed weight, 100-seed weight and seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher soybean straw yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
straw yield (q ha-1)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher French bean plant height, branches and leaf area.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher French bean dry matter, green pod number and green pod yield per plant.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with crop residue management gave higher French bean green pod yield and straw yield.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
conventional tillage with crop residue managemente1
Outcome
yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Among the tillage practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the tillage practices with crop residue management treatments, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed higher in (T1) conventional tillage with crop residue management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 under organic nutrient management significantly increased soybean plant height, branches and leaf area.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased soybean root nodule number and dry matter.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased soybean pod number, seeds per pod and pod weight.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased soybean seed weight, 100-seed weight and seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased soybean straw yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
straw yield (q ha-1)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased French bean plant height, branches and leaf area.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased French bean dry matter, green pod number and green pod yield per plant.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM at 7.5 t ha-1 significantly increased French bean green pod yield and straw yield.

Taxon
French beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1e2
Outcome
yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1)e2
Direction
significantly highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“growth and yield of soybean: French bean cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“In organic nutrient management, plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), no. of root nodules plant-1, dry matter production (g plant-1) no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1, pod weight plant-1 (g), seed weight plant-1 (g), 100 seed weight (g) seed yield (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of soybean and plant height (cm), no. of branches, leaf area plant-1 (dm2), dry matter (g plant-1) no. of green pods plant-1, green pod yield plant-1(g), yield of green pod (q ha-1) and straw yield (q ha-1) of French bean was observed significantly higher in (F3 and S3) application of FYM @ 7.5 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1768 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

84 papers: 52 positive, 32 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

organic · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

organic · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

tillage · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 9 positive, 13 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

organic · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

organic · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.