Claim · model-written summary
K omission reduced maize grain yield by 13.6% versus T1.
- Treatment
- N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omissione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 13.6e0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Title
Productivity of Maize (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Nutrient Omission in Inceptisols of Nagaland
Mary Lalfakzuali Y. K. Sharma International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2021. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1008.012
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Maize growth, yield attributes and yield were superior with all nutrients applied.
- Intervention effect Maximum grain yield was 3975.03 kg ha-1 with T1.
- Intervention effect Maximum stover yield was 5107.66 kg ha-1 with T1.
- Intervention effect Lowest grain yield was 2996.91 kg ha-1 with N omission.
- Intervention effect Lowest stover yield was 3940.51 kg ha-1 with N omission.
- Intervention effect N omission reduced maize grain yield by 24.6% versus T1.
- Intervention effect P omission reduced maize grain yield by 21.0% versus T1.
- Intervention effect Zn omission reduced maize grain yield by 8.0% versus T1.
- Intervention effect B omission reduced maize grain yield by 9.1% versus T1.
- Intervention effect lime omission reduced maize grain yield by 17.4% versus T1.
- Observation Grain yield reduction ranked N, P, lime, K, B, Zn.
- Intervention effect Maize nutrient uptake was significantly higher under T1.
- Intervention effect Postharvest soil available N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn and B were significantly higher under T1.