Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at the instructional farm, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, SASRD, Nagaland University, during the Kharif season of 2019 to study the productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by nutrient omission in Inceptisols of Nagaland. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications and seven treatments. The growth, yield attributes and yield of maize were found to be superior in the treatment where all nutrients (N, P, K, Zn, B, lime) were applied. Maximum grain and stover yield (3975.03 and 5107.66 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded with treatment T1whereas the lowest was observed with omission of N (2996.91 and 3940.51 kg ha-1, respectively).N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment. The per cent grain yield reduction based on limiting nutrients were found in the order N>P > Lime >K>B > Zn. The nutrient uptake by maize, available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, exchangeable calcium and magnesium, available zinc and boron in post-harvest soil were found significantly higher under the treatment T1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Maize growth, yield attributes and yield were superior with all nutrients applied.
- Treatment
- all nutrients (N, P, K, Zn, B, lime)e0
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributes and yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The growth, yield attributes and yield of maize were found to be superior in the treatment where all nutrients (N, P, K, Zn, B, lime) were applied.”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum grain yield was 3975.03 kg ha-1 with T1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum grain and stover yield (3975.03 and 5107.66 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded with treatment T1whereas the lowest was observed with omission of N (2996.91 and 3940.51 kg ha-1, respectively).”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum stover yield was 5107.66 kg ha-1 with T1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum grain and stover yield (3975.03 and 5107.66 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded with treatment T1whereas the lowest was observed with omission of N (2996.91 and 3940.51 kg ha-1, respectively).”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Lowest grain yield was 2996.91 kg ha-1 with N omission.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum grain and stover yield (3975.03 and 5107.66 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded with treatment T1whereas the lowest was observed with omission of N (2996.91 and 3940.51 kg ha-1, respectively).”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Lowest stover yield was 3940.51 kg ha-1 with N omission.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum grain and stover yield (3975.03 and 5107.66 kg ha-1, respectively) were recorded with treatment T1whereas the lowest was observed with omission of N (2996.91 and 3940.51 kg ha-1, respectively).”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
N omission reduced maize grain yield by 24.6% versus T1.
- Treatment
- N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omissione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 24.6e0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
P omission reduced maize grain yield by 21.0% versus T1.
- Treatment
- N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omissione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 21.0e0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
K omission reduced maize grain yield by 13.6% versus T1.
- Treatment
- N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omissione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 13.6e0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn omission reduced maize grain yield by 8.0% versus T1.
- Treatment
- N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omissione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 8.0e0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
B omission reduced maize grain yield by 9.1% versus T1.
- Treatment
- N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omissione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 9.1e0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
lime omission reduced maize grain yield by 17.4% versus T1.
- Treatment
- N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omissione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 17.4e0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N, P, K, Zn, B and lime omission reduced grain yield to the extent of 24.6, 21.0, 13.6, 8.0, 9.1 and 17.4 % respectively over T1 treatment.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield reduction ranked N, P, lime, K, B, Zn.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The per cent grain yield reduction based on limiting nutrients were found in the order N>P > Lime >K>B > Zn.”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize nutrient uptake was significantly higher under T1.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutrient uptake by maize, available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, exchangeable calcium and magnesium, available zinc and boron in post-harvest soil were found significantly higher under the treatment T1.”
Claim · model-written summary
Postharvest soil available N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn and B were significantly higher under T1.
- Treatment
- T1e0
- Outcome
- available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, exchangeable calcium and magnesium, available zinc and boron in post-harvest soile0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutrient uptake by maize, available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, exchangeable calcium and magnesium, available zinc and boron in post-harvest soil were found significantly higher under the treatment T1.”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
215 papers more in this group
See all 219 papers →potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
290 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
316 papers more in this group
See all 320 papers →phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
623 papers more in this group
See all 627 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.