Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The organic manure combination produced minimum fruit drop (38.29 and 38.01%) versus maximum fruit drop (83.62 and 83.06%) under NPK in the two years.

A claim from Effect of organic manures on the flowering, fruiting and yield of peach (Prunus persicaBatsch) cv. Florida Prince · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The organic manure combination produced minimum fruit drop (38.29 and 38.01%) versus maximum fruit drop (83.62 and 83.06%) under NPK in the two years.

Material
Florida Princet0
Treatment
FYM 30 kg+vermicompost 10 kg+poultry manure 2.5 kg+neem cake 3 kg/treee1
Outcome
minimum fruit drope0
Direction
minimume0
Value
38.29 and 38.01%e0
Qualifier
83.62 and 83.06%e2
Comparator
N: P: K, 200: 150: 200 g/trree3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach (Prunus persicaBatsch) cv. Florida Prince”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–113
e0

“minimum fruit drop (38.29 and 38.01%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–579
e1

“application of FYM 30 kg+vermicompost 10 kg+poultry manure 2.5 kg+neem cake 3 kg/tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–841
e2

“maximum fruit drop (83.62 and 83.06%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–998
e3

“application of N: P: K, 200: 150: 200 g/trre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1227

Title

Effect of organic manures on the flowering, fruiting and yield of peach (Prunus persicaBatsch) cv. Florida Prince

Alakh Narayan; P. N. Singh; Saurabh Kumar Singh; et al. Research on Crops 2016. doi:10.5958/2348-7542.2016.00015.2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e4a87eec4008ba45bac5650cde5b7e41ec62d8de6834f74979aab9df07d381b0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

59 papers: 50 positive, 9 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

botanical · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.