Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatment gave significantly higher haulm yield in residual cowpea than all other treatments (2411.86 kg/ha).

A claim from Effect of treated effluent from beverage industry irrigation on growth and yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize: Cowpea cropping sequence · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave significantly higher haulm yield in residual cowpea than all other treatments (2411.86 kg/ha).

Treatment
irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsume2
Outcome
seed and haulm yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
2411.86 kg ha-1e2
Qualifier
haulm yielde2
Comparator
all other treatmentse2
Setting
Bidadi, Ramanagara district of Karnatakae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Among the plant parameters in residual cowpea crop higher plant height (45.44 cm), No of branches plant-1 (10.00), seed and haulm yield (1023.33 kg ha-1and 2411.86 kg ha-1, respectively) were significantly higher in the treatment receiving irrigation with beverage industry effluent + RDF + gypsum (T7) compared to all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–871
e0

“A field experiment was conducted in the premises of coca cola Pvt. Ltd., near Bidadi, Ramanagara district of Karnataka during 2017-18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133

Title

Effect of treated effluent from beverage industry irrigation on growth and yield of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)] in maize: Cowpea cropping sequence

Mallesh KU; T Chikkaramappa; PK Basavaraja; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i6aq.11896

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e68a4108b07970c9321a2ba4d980c5d31c72cc0bf78e00e53ddfde7f7050d403 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

lime · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Liming did not influence grain yield.

    Liming, fertilization, and rhizobia inoculation on cowpea yield in a Brazilian Amazon upland forest environment · 2021

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Gypsum gave a lower yardlong bean seed yield than the chemical method, at 31.41 kg/rai.

    Effect of a bio-extract solution from water convolvulus and gypsum on yield and quality of yardlong bean seed · 2007 · compared with chemical method

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Lime doses did not significantly increase cowpea grain production.

    Production of Caupi Beans and Chemical Attributes of a Latosol Under Soil Correction Levels · 2018

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Liming increased cowpea yields only in the third year.

    Aluminum and Calcium Constraints to Continuous Crop Production in a Brazilian Amazon Oxisol · 1992

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Liming increased cowpea productivity.

    Rhizobia inoculation and liming increase cowpea productivity in Maranhão State · 2016

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Cowpea yield increased with lime rate up to a point.

    Combined lime and biochar application enhances cowpea growth and yield in tropical Alfisol · 2024

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Residual effect of NK+ liming and only NK gave better grain yield, number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod in cowpea.

    Cowpea yield on soils with residues of NPK and natural phosphate fertilizers in succession the area of degraded pasture · 2016

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Cowpea growth and production responded to liming and P and K mineral fertilization.

    Growth and production of cowpea cultivated with liming and nitrogen fertilization in the Eastern Amazon · 2021

    Same direction

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 50 positive, 11 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Yield components were highest under normal watering, followed by deficit at pod formation.

    Effect of water deficit at different stages of development on the yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) genotypes · 2018 · compared with normal watering

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Net yield income decreased in stressed irrigation across all tested cultivars.

    Effect of drought stress on the incidence of certain arthropod pests and predators inhabiting cowpea plantations · 2006 · compared with normal irrigated one

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Restricted irrigation reduced cowpea yield by 40% in the first year.

    Foliar Application of Zinc Improves Agronomical and Quality Parameters and Biofortification of Cowpea (Vigna sinensis) under Deficit Irrigation · 2023

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Higher irrigation salinity reduced cowpea dry matter accumulation.

    Tolerance of seedlings traditional varieties of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) to salt stress · 2020

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    At 48 kg K2O fed-1, 50% irrigation reduced total dry forage yield by 57.0% relative to normal irrigation.

    WATER STRESS TOLERANCE OF FODDER COWPEA AS INFLUENCED BY VARIOUS ADDED LEVELS OF POTASSIUM SULPHATE · 2015 · compared with commonly practiced irrigation

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Cowpea productivity was reduced by an average of 827 kg ha-1 without irrigation compared with irrigation at 100% of crop water demand, over three years.

    Performance of Cowpea under Different Water Regimes in Amazonian Conditions · 2022 · compared with the treatment irrigated with 100% of the crop

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Increasing irrigation deficit reduce seed yield/fed..

    Effect of Water Stress and Phosphorus Fertilizer Rates on Growth and Seed Yield of Cowpea Under El-Arish Condition · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Higher irrigation water salinity reduced yield in BRS Tumucumaque.

    Tolerance of Different Cowpea Cultivars Subjected to Irrigation with Saline Waters · 2025

    Opposite direction

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Baglog compost mixed with cow manure had no significant effect on stem diameter, pod number and pod length.

    Respon Pemberian Campuran Kompos Baglog Dengan Pupuk Kandang Sapi dan Pupuk Organik Cair (POC) Limbah Cair Pabrik Kelapa Sawit Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Tanaman Kacang Panjang (Vigna sinensis L.). · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    62 Mg ha−1 manure decreased cowpea grain and biomass yield.

    Cattle manure and intercropping effects on soil properties and growth and yield of pearl millet and cowpea in Namibia · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Phosphorus application had no significant effect on cowpea growth and yield.

    Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application on growth and yield performance of cowpea in Ghana · 2017

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Residual KCl fertilization did not affect cowpea grain yield.

    Sistemas de manejo e efeito residual do potássio na produtividade e nutrição do feijão-caupi · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Adding fertilizer N to inoculated cowpeas did not increase seed yield.

    Interaction Between Rhizobial Inoculation and Fertilizer Nitrogen in Five Cowpea Cultivars · 1986

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Grain yield did not differ among seven rhizobia inoculations, mineral nitrogen fertilization and controls.

    Strategies for Improving Cowpea Grain Yield in the Eastern Amazon: Biological Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphorus Nutrition, and Molybdenum Seed Enrichment · 2023 · compared with the control (without inoculation and N fertilization)

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect harvest time of cowpeas.

    Effects of Fertilizers on Harvest Time and Yield of Cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) in Sierra Leone · 1973

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Previous FYM application rate did not significantly affect 100-seed weight of cowpea.

    Response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] to residual effect of different application rates of sheep manure on chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum) · 2010

    Opposite direction

283 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.