Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Co-applying mineral nitrogen with 50% ammonia sulfate and 50% Enciabeen increased total soluble solids, berry weight and berry dimensions.

A claim from Soil properties improvement and nitrogen leaching induced compost and mineral fertilization for maximizing grapevines production in arid regions, El-Minia, Egypt · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-applying mineral nitrogen with 50% ammonia sulfate and 50% Enciabeen increased total soluble solids, berry weight and berry dimensions.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
co-applying mineral nitrogen fertilizer at a rate of 50% ammonia sulfate and 50% Enciabeene3
Outcome
Total soluble solid (TSS) %, berry weight, and dimensionse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grapevines production in arid regions, El-Minia, Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–161
e3

“The results of principal component analysis revealed that co-applying mineral nitrogen fertilizer at a rate of 50% ammonia sulfate and 50% Enciabeen or co-applying 50% ammonia sulfate and 50% compost as an organic nitrogen source caused a gradual improvement in berry quality, increased Total soluble solid (TSS) %, berry weight, and dimensions, TSS/acid, and total sugars %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1362

Title

Soil properties improvement and nitrogen leaching induced compost and mineral fertilization for maximizing grapevines production in arid regions, El-Minia, Egypt

T. M. Fawzi; A. S. A. Abdel-Mawgoud; M. A. M. Abada; et al. Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal/Archives of Agriculture Sciences Journal 2024. doi:10.21608/aasj.2024.385599

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e801006d4ca4c163f9ad07770fb0ed0ea2a7e65ab77973b0932e00aa9f223b5c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

sulfate · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.