Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cucumber root fresh weights tended lower at 0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% rind powder.

A claim from EVALUATION OF ROSELLE (HIBISCUS SABDARIFFA) LEAF AND POMEGRANATE (PUNICA GRANATUM) FRUIT RIND FOR ACTIVITY AGAINST MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber root fresh weights tended lower at 0.25%, 0.5% and 1.0% rind powder.

Taxon
cucumber seedlingsCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
Pomegranate fruit rind powdere3
Outcome
root fresh weightse1
Direction
lowere1
Value
0.25%, 0.5%, and 1.0%e2
Qualifier
tended to bee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1404
e1

“root fresh weights also tended to be lower at these concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1687
e2

“0.25%, 0.5%, and 1.0% powder application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1615
e3

“Pomegranate fruit rind powder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1305

Title

EVALUATION OF ROSELLE (HIBISCUS SABDARIFFA) LEAF AND POMEGRANATE (PUNICA GRANATUM) FRUIT RIND FOR ACTIVITY AGAINST MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA

Susan L. F. Meyer; Kamlesh R. Chauhan; Margaret H. MacDonald 2016

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-edbc00816dd32af7b3bfd9c1bf719833c28b0854756ef95c6438b1bcb3ca0083 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

botanical · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 66 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.