Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sequential atrazine fb 2,4-D EE had the highest benefit cost ratio and increment in benefit over the weedy check, significantly better than other treatments.

A claim from Effect Of Weed Management Practices On Weed Dynamics, Yield And Economics Of Spring Maize At Dhading Besi, Nepal · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential atrazine fb 2,4-D EE had the highest benefit cost ratio and increment in benefit over the weedy check, significantly better than other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
atrazine fb 2,4-D EEe0
Outcome
benefit cost ratio and increment in benefite0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–89
e0

“The benefit cost ratio and increment in benefit over weedy check were highest in atrazine fb 2,4-D EE followed by atrazine and significantly better than other weed management treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1882

Title

Effect Of Weed Management Practices On Weed Dynamics, Yield And Economics Of Spring Maize At Dhading Besi, Nepal

Bhimsen Shrestha; Shrawan Kumar Sah; D. Marasini; et al. Agronomy Journal of Nepal 2021. doi:10.3126/ajn.v5i01.44825

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-fa26fe46e31fa7f60d1895e79d7ff618bf8dffc27c93433ac3ff4ca75884bf1f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 30 positive, 6 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.