Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Synthetic silicon reduced root cadmium concentration by 42.60%.

A claim from Mitigating cadmium (Cd) toxicity and enhancing growth, yield, and antioxidant defence of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through silicon fertilizers · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic silicon reduced root cadmium concentration by 42.60%.

Treatment
synthetic Si fertilizatione0
Outcome
Cd concentration in roote0
Direction
reducede0
Value
42.60%e0
Comparator
control (Cd stress)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“synthetic Si fertilization was more effective than natural Si fertilization as it produced highest increase in plant height (21.40%), grain yield (25.21%), and reduced Cd concentration in root (42.60%) and shoot (59.71%) than control (Cd stress).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1407
e1

“of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–117

Title

Mitigating cadmium (Cd) toxicity and enhancing growth, yield, and antioxidant defence of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through silicon fertilizers

Muhammad K. SOHAIL; Mukkram A. TAHIR; Zulfiqar A. SAQIB; et al. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2025. doi:10.15835/nbha53414874

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-fd7d4ad7e26ffbd2a8db4c59949675d20e566b1255e736faffbdd753621ebd11 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this claim · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

950 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.