Paper · 2026 · BMC Plant Biology

Comparative efficacy of natural and synthetic silicon fertilizers in enhancing yield and mitigating heavy metals (Cd and Pb) toxicity by modulating antioxidant activity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Muhammad Kashif Sohail; Abdul Ghafoor; Muhammad Munir; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Heavy metals contamination, particularly cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb), poses a major threat to wheat productivity and human health. The comparative efficacy of natural and synthetic sources of Si fertilization to alleviate heavy metals stress in wheat remains largely unexplored. A pot study comprising thirteen treatments was designed under a completely randomized design (CRD) to assess the synthetic (Ca silicate) and natural (treated burnt rice husk) Si fertilizers in promoting the wheat growth and mitigating the adverse effects of heavy metals-induced toxicity. Five surface-sterilized seeds of wheat cv. Faisalabad-2008 were sown in pots under controlled conditions (25 °C temperature, 75% relative humidity and 16/8 h light/dark period) from sowing to maturity (170 days). Application of both Si sources considerably enhanced all the agronomic, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of wheat by reducing the adverse impact of heavy metals stress. However, in comparison, the synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilization proved superior, resulting in the greatest improvements in plant height (11.60%) and grain yield (12.84%), while marked reduction in Cd (15.53%) and Pb (10.02%) contents in shoot under heavy metals stress. Si application increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activities and reduced the electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA), demonstrating effective mitigation of the oxidative stress. The correlation analysis proved that the positive changes in agronomic characteristics caused by Si fertilization were highly correlated with lower heavy metals uptake and increased antioxidant activities. Collectively, both Si fertilizer sources significantly reduced the Cd and Pb toxicity, however, in comparison; the synthetic Si fertilizer was more effective in enhancing the wheat productivity under Cd or Pb stress than natural Si fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both silicon sources improved agronomic, physiological, and biochemical wheat traits under heavy metal stress.

Treatment
both Si sourcese0
Outcome
agronomic, physiological, and biochemical characteristicse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of both Si sources considerably enhanced all the agronomic, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of wheat by reducing the adverse impact of heavy metals stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic Ca silicate increased wheat plant height by 11.60%.

Treatment
synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilizatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
11.60%e0
Qualifier
under heavy metals stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in comparison, the synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilization proved superior, resulting in the greatest improvements in plant height (11.60%) and grain yield (12.84%), while marked reduction in Cd (15.53%) and Pb (10.02%) contents in shoot under heavy metals stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic Ca silicate increased grain yield by 12.84%.

Treatment
synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
12.84%e0
Qualifier
under heavy metals stresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in comparison, the synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilization proved superior, resulting in the greatest improvements in plant height (11.60%) and grain yield (12.84%), while marked reduction in Cd (15.53%) and Pb (10.02%) contents in shoot under heavy metals stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic Ca silicate reduced shoot Cd content by 15.53%.

Treatment
synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilizatione0
Outcome
Cde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
15.53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in comparison, the synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilization proved superior, resulting in the greatest improvements in plant height (11.60%) and grain yield (12.84%), while marked reduction in Cd (15.53%) and Pb (10.02%) contents in shoot under heavy metals stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic Ca silicate reduced shoot Pb content by 10.02%.

Treatment
synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilizatione0
Outcome
Pbe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, in comparison, the synthetic Si (Ca silicate) fertilization proved superior, resulting in the greatest improvements in plant height (11.60%) and grain yield (12.84%), while marked reduction in Cd (15.53%) and Pb (10.02%) contents in shoot under heavy metals stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si increased SOD and POD activities.

Treatment
Si applicatione0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si application increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activities and reduced the electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA), demonstrating effective mitigation of the oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si reduced electrolyte leakage and malondialdehyde.

Treatment
Si applicatione0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si application increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activities and reduced the electrolyte leakage (EL) and malondialdehyde (MDA), demonstrating effective mitigation of the oxidative stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic improvements correlated with lower heavy metal uptake and increased antioxidant activities.

Treatment
Si fertilizatione0
Outcome
positive changes in agronomic characteristicse0
Qualifier
lower heavy metals uptake and increased antioxidant activitiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation analysis proved that the positive changes in agronomic characteristics caused by Si fertilization were highly correlated with lower heavy metals uptake and increased antioxidant activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1655 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both Si sources significantly reduced Cd and Pb toxicity.

Treatment
both Si fertilizer sourcese0
Outcome
Cd and Pb toxicitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Collectively, both Si fertilizer sources significantly reduced the Cd and Pb toxicity, however, in comparison; the synthetic Si fertilizer was more effective in enhancing the wheat productivity under Cd or Pb stress than natural Si fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1899 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic Si was more effective than natural Si for productivity under Cd or Pb stress.

Treatment
synthetic Si fertilizere0
Outcome
wheat productivitye0
Direction
more effectivee0
Qualifier
under Cd or Pb stresse0
Comparator
natural Si fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Collectively, both Si fertilizer sources significantly reduced the Cd and Pb toxicity, however, in comparison; the synthetic Si fertilizer was more effective in enhancing the wheat productivity under Cd or Pb stress than natural Si fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1899 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 172–200 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

silicate(4-) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 40 positive, 1 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

calcium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

43 papers: 35 positive, 8 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.