Claim · model-written summary
Thiram dressing on Mitk indicated a yield increment at both locations.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Material
- Mitke0
- Treatment
- Thiram seed-dressing fungicidese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- incremente0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thiram seed-dressing fungicides followed by apron star on Mitk variety indicates reasonable yield increment in both locations”
e1“different chickpea varieties”
Title
Zemenu Endalew Alefe; Gizachew Haylemariam Betselot; Ahmed Mohamed Yasin Advances in Agriculture 2022. doi:10.1155/2022/9324559
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Observation Mitk had significantly lower disease pressure than Arerti and the local variety.
- Observation Mitk gave better yield than Arerti and the local variety.
- Observation Mitk wilt incidence was 6.23%, compared with 17% for Arerti.
- Observation Mitk disease-progress area was 292.1%-day, compared with 873%-day for Arerti.
- Observation Local chickpea was highly infected.
- Observation The local chickpea variety yielded 0.4 t/ha, almost half the Mitk yield.
- Intervention effect Seed-dressing fungicides did not differ significantly in wilt incidence.
- Intervention effect Seed-dressing fungicides did not differ significantly in disease-progress area.
- Intervention effect Apron Star dressing on Mitk indicated a yield increment at both locations.
- Recommendation The authors advise Mitk with Thiram followed by Apron Star to manage wilt.