By organism › Green plants › Vitaceae › Vitis ×labruscana

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vvgai1 reduced grapevine leaf and shoot length through smaller internodes and an increased phyllochron.

Taxon: Vitis labruscanaVitis ×labruscanat0
Treatment: Vvgai1 mutatione0
Gene: Vvgai1e0
Outcome: leaf and shoot lengthe0
Direction: miniaturisatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Vvgai1 mutation induced a strong miniaturisation of leaf and shoot length, as a result of a significant reduction of internodes size and an increase of the phyllochron.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–688

t0
“Vitis labruscana microvines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–89

Title

Vvgai1 mutation impacts both organogenesis and functioning in Vitis labruscana microvines

Jana Kändler; Luciana Wilhelm de Almeida; Laurent Torregrosa Scientia Horticulturae 2026. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2026.114643

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microvine main shoot lignification was delayed relative to macrovines.

Taxon: Vitis labruscanaVitis ×labruscanat0
Material: microvinese0
Outcome: lignification of the main shootse0
Direction: delayede0
Comparator: macrovine counterpartse0

Verbatim

e0
“The lignification of the main shoots was delayed in the microvines in comparison to their macrovine counterparts”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–801

t0
“Vitis labruscana microvines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–89

Title

Vvgai1 mutation impacts both organogenesis and functioning in Vitis labruscana microvines

Jana Kändler; Luciana Wilhelm de Almeida; Laurent Torregrosa Scientia Horticulturae 2026. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2026.114643

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Vvgai1 mutation did not affect leaf carbon assimilation rate.

Taxon: Vitis labruscanaVitis ×labruscanat0
Treatment: Vvgai1 mutatione1
Outcome: leaf C assimilation ratee0
Direction: not impactede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the leaf C assimilation rate was not impacted by the mutation.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–870

e1
“we introduced the Vvgai1 mutation in V. vinifera x V. labrusca hybrids.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–519

t0
“Vitis labruscana microvines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–89

Title

Vvgai1 mutation impacts both organogenesis and functioning in Vitis labruscana microvines

Jana Kändler; Luciana Wilhelm de Almeida; Laurent Torregrosa Scientia Horticulturae 2026. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2026.114643

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrovines reached adult phyllotaxis and first tendril at lower node rank than microvines.

Taxon: Vitis labruscanaVitis ×labruscanat0
Material: macrovinese0
Outcome: shift from the alternate spiral (juvenile) to distichous (adult) phyllotaxis and the appearance of the first tendrile0
Direction: lowere0

Verbatim

e0
“The shift from the alternate spiral (juvenile) to distichous (adult) phyllotaxis and the appearance of the first tendril occurred at lower node rank in macrovines.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1034

t0
“Vitis labruscana microvines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–89

Title

Vvgai1 mutation impacts both organogenesis and functioning in Vitis labruscana microvines

Jana Kändler; Luciana Wilhelm de Almeida; Laurent Torregrosa Scientia Horticulturae 2026. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2026.114643

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microvines produced first perfect flowers from internode 18 within months, while macrovines produced none in the first vegetative cycle.

Taxon: Vitis labruscanaVitis ×labruscanat0
Material: microvinese0
Organ / stage: main shoote0
Outcome: first perfect flowerse0
Value: internode 18e0
Comparator: macrovinese0

Verbatim

e0
“while macrovines did not produce any reproductive organs during the first vegetative cycle, microvines displayed the first perfect flowers on the main shoot from the internode 18, only a few months after embryo rescue and acclimation.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1278

t0
“Vitis labruscana microvines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–89

Title

Vvgai1 mutation impacts both organogenesis and functioning in Vitis labruscana microvines

Jana Kändler; Luciana Wilhelm de Almeida; Laurent Torregrosa Scientia Horticulturae 2026. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2026.114643

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Vvgai1 reduced grapevine leaf and shoot length through smaller internodes and an increased phyllochron.
Observation Microvine main shoot lignification was delayed relative to macrovines.
Intervention effect The Vvgai1 mutation did not affect leaf carbon assimilation rate.
Observation Macrovines reached adult phyllotaxis and first tendril at lower node rank than microvines.
Observation Sex type segregation confirmed heterozygosity at the sex determining locus of V. labrusca cv. Isabella.
Association Opposite-to-leaves organ proportions suggested complex genetic determination of that trait.

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Opposite-to-leaves organ proportions suggested complex genetic determination of that trait.

Taxon: Vitis labruscanaVitis ×labruscanat0
Material: labrusca - versus vinifera -type distributione0
Outcome: proportion of opposite-to-leaves organse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the proportion of opposite-to-leaves organs following a labrusca - versus vinifera -type distribution suggested a more complex genetic determinism for this trait.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1575

t0
“Vitis labruscana microvines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–89

Title

Vvgai1 mutation impacts both organogenesis and functioning in Vitis labruscana microvines

Jana Kändler; Luciana Wilhelm de Almeida; Laurent Torregrosa Scientia Horticulturae 2026. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2026.114643

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LED increased photosynthate portion in grapevine clusters.

Taxon: Vitis labruscana L.H. BaileyVitis ×labruscanat0
Treatment: Blue light-emitting diode (LED) irradiatione0
Outcome: portion of 13 C-photosynthatese0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0
“Blue light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation increased the portion of 13 C-photosynthates in the grapevine clusters that were fed 13 CO 2 ; compared to the portion in the cluster in the untreated control.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–505

t0
“Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127

Title

Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines

Satoru Kondo; Miho Ishioka; Chihiro Hoshi; et al. Plant Growth Regulation 2024. doi:10.1007/s10725-024-01206-1

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Blue LED increased berry fructose and glucose.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased berry VvSWEET10, VvSUC11 and VvSUS4 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED lowered berry sucrose at 14 days.
Mechanism Authors speculated that transporter and synthase expression relates to lower sucrose and photosynthate transport.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased VvSnRK2.6 and VvABF1 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED decreased VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased photoreceptor gene expression.
Intervention effect AS6 did not affect berry ABA concentrations.
Intervention effect AS6 decreased berry sucrose at harvest.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect berry sugar concentrations.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect VvSnRK2.6 or VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect NDGA did not affect sugar concentration at harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LED increased berry fructose and glucose.

Taxon: Vitis labruscana L.H. BaileyVitis ×labruscanat0
Treatment: blue LED-irradiatede0
Outcome: Fructose and glucose concentrationse0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Fructose and glucose concentrations and the expressions of VvSWEET10 , VvSUC11 , and VvSUS4 in blue LED-irradiated berries were increased.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–644

t0
“Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127

Title

Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines

Satoru Kondo; Miho Ishioka; Chihiro Hoshi; et al. Plant Growth Regulation 2024. doi:10.1007/s10725-024-01206-1

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Blue LED increased photosynthate portion in grapevine clusters.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased berry VvSWEET10, VvSUC11 and VvSUS4 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED lowered berry sucrose at 14 days.
Mechanism Authors speculated that transporter and synthase expression relates to lower sucrose and photosynthate transport.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased VvSnRK2.6 and VvABF1 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED decreased VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased photoreceptor gene expression.
Intervention effect AS6 did not affect berry ABA concentrations.
Intervention effect AS6 decreased berry sucrose at harvest.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect berry sugar concentrations.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect VvSnRK2.6 or VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect NDGA did not affect sugar concentration at harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LED increased berry VvSWEET10, VvSUC11 and VvSUS4 expression.

Taxon: Vitis labruscana L.H. BaileyVitis ×labruscanat0
Treatment: blue LED-irradiatede0
Gene: VvSWEET10 , VvSUC11 , and VvSUS4e0
Outcome: expressions of VvSWEET10 , VvSUC11 , and VvSUS4e0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Fructose and glucose concentrations and the expressions of VvSWEET10 , VvSUC11 , and VvSUS4 in blue LED-irradiated berries were increased.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–644

t0
“Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127

Title

Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines

Satoru Kondo; Miho Ishioka; Chihiro Hoshi; et al. Plant Growth Regulation 2024. doi:10.1007/s10725-024-01206-1

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Blue LED increased photosynthate portion in grapevine clusters.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased berry fructose and glucose.
Intervention effect Blue LED lowered berry sucrose at 14 days.
Mechanism Authors speculated that transporter and synthase expression relates to lower sucrose and photosynthate transport.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased VvSnRK2.6 and VvABF1 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED decreased VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased photoreceptor gene expression.
Intervention effect AS6 did not affect berry ABA concentrations.
Intervention effect AS6 decreased berry sucrose at harvest.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect berry sugar concentrations.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect VvSnRK2.6 or VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect NDGA did not affect sugar concentration at harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LED lowered berry sucrose at 14 days.

Taxon: Vitis labruscana L.H. BaileyVitis ×labruscanat0
Treatment: blue LED-irradiatede0
Outcome: sucrose concentrationse0
Direction: lowere0
Qualifier: 14 days after treatmente0
Comparator: untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0
“The blue LED-irradiated berries’ sucrose concentrations were significantly lower than the untreated control at 14 days after treatment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–780

t0
“Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–127

Title

Effects of blue-light irradiation on abscisic acid signaling and sugar translocation in Vitis labruscana L.H. Bailey grapevines

Satoru Kondo; Miho Ishioka; Chihiro Hoshi; et al. Plant Growth Regulation 2024. doi:10.1007/s10725-024-01206-1

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Blue LED increased photosynthate portion in grapevine clusters.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased berry fructose and glucose.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased berry VvSWEET10, VvSUC11 and VvSUS4 expression.
Mechanism Authors speculated that transporter and synthase expression relates to lower sucrose and photosynthate transport.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased VvSnRK2.6 and VvABF1 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED decreased VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect Blue LED increased photoreceptor gene expression.
Intervention effect AS6 did not affect berry ABA concentrations.
Intervention effect AS6 decreased berry sucrose at harvest.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect berry sugar concentrations.
Intervention effect ABA application did not affect VvSnRK2.6 or VvPP2C9 expression.
Intervention effect NDGA did not affect sugar concentration at harvest.

Vitis ×labruscana 451 claims

451 claims