Paper · 2014 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of potassium and zinc fertilizer on crop yield, nutrient uptake and distribution of potassium and zinc fractions in Typic Ustipsamment

GAJANAND JAT; S P MAJUMDAR; N K JAT; et al.

16
claims
26
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of potassium and zinc fertilizer on status and content of potassium and zinc fractions and their effect on crop yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient availability in the soil. Significant increase in grain yield, straw yield, K uptake, and different K fractions in the soil (exchangeable K, water soluble K, Morgan’s extractable K, lattice K and total K in the soil) were recorded with increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/ha. Zinc fertilization in wheat also significantly increased crop yield and Zn uptake but interaction between K and Zn was not found to be significant in respect of yield, uptake, and various K and Zn fractions. Water-soluble K showed significant and positive correlation with exchangeable K (r= 0.928), Morgan’s extractable K (r= 0.983) and lattice K (r= 0.969), indicating rapid equilibrium establishment between these forms. Step wise regression analysis using different pools of K revealed the importance of water soluble K and lattice K influencing crop yield, K uptake by wheat. Similarly, application of 9 kg Zn/ha increased the Zn fractions present in soil and correlation data indicated that these fractions are in a state of dynamic equilibrium with each other. In the present study, DTPA-Zn accounted for 65% and 70% of the variation in grain yield and Zn uptake by wheat, indicating that DTPA-Zn was efficient in providing Zn nutrition to wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K from 0 to 60 kg K/ha significantly increased grain yield.

Treatment
increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in grain yield, straw yield, K uptake, and different K fractions in the soil (exchangeable K, water soluble K, Morgan’s extractable K, lattice K and total K in the soil) were recorded with increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K significantly increased straw yield.

Treatment
increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/hae0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in grain yield, straw yield, K uptake, and different K fractions in the soil (exchangeable K, water soluble K, Morgan’s extractable K, lattice K and total K in the soil) were recorded with increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K significantly increased wheat K uptake.

Treatment
increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/hae0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase in grain yield, straw yield, K uptake, and different K fractions in the soil (exchangeable K, water soluble K, Morgan’s extractable K, lattice K and total K in the soil) were recorded with increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K significantly increased exchangeable, water soluble, Morgan’s extractable, lattice and total soil K.

Treatment
increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/hae0
Outcome
different K fractions in the soile0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different K fractions in the soil (exchangeable K, water soluble K, Morgan’s extractable K, lattice K and total K in the soil) were recorded with increase in K levels from 0 to 60 kg K/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat also significantly increased crop yield and Zn uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization significantly increased wheat Zn uptake.

Treatment
Zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat also significantly increased crop yield and Zn uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The K by Zn interaction was not significant for yield, uptake or soil fractions.

Outcome
yield, uptake, and various K and Zn fractionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction between K and Zn was not found to be significant in respect of yield, uptake, and various K and Zn fractions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble K was positively correlated with exchangeable K at r= 0.928.

Outcome
Water-soluble Ke0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r= 0.928e0
Comparator
exchangeable Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-soluble K showed significant and positive correlation with exchangeable K (r= 0.928), Morgan’s extractable K (r= 0.983) and lattice K (r= 0.969)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble K was positively correlated with Morgan’s extractable K at r= 0.983.

Outcome
Water-soluble Ke0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r= 0.983e0
Comparator
Morgan’s extractable Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-soluble K showed significant and positive correlation with exchangeable K (r= 0.928), Morgan’s extractable K (r= 0.983) and lattice K (r= 0.969)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble K was positively correlated with lattice K at r= 0.969.

Outcome
Water-soluble Ke0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r= 0.969e0
Comparator
lattice Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water-soluble K showed significant and positive correlation with exchangeable K (r= 0.928), Morgan’s extractable K (r= 0.983) and lattice K (r= 0.969)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression identified water soluble and lattice K as important for crop yield.

Compound
water soluble K and lattice Ke0
Outcome
crop yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Step wise regression analysis using different pools of K revealed the importance of water soluble K and lattice K influencing crop yield, K uptake by wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1060 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression identified water soluble and lattice K as important for wheat K uptake.

Compound
water soluble K and lattice Ke0
Outcome
K uptake by wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Step wise regression analysis using different pools of K revealed the importance of water soluble K and lattice K influencing crop yield, K uptake by wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 9 kg Zn/ha increased soil Zn fractions.

Treatment
application of 9 kg Zn/hae0
Outcome
Zn fractions present in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 9 kg Zn/ha increased the Zn fractions present in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Zn fractions were in dynamic equilibrium with each other.

Outcome
these fractions are in a state of dynamic equilibrium with each othere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“correlation data indicated that these fractions are in a state of dynamic equilibrium with each other.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zinc fertilization in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–507 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTPA-Zn accounted for 65% of grain yield variation.

Compound
DTPA-Zne0
Outcome
variation in grain yielde0
Value
65%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DTPA-Zn accounted for 65% and 70% of the variation in grain yield and Zn uptake by wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1358 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTPA-Zn accounted for 70% of wheat Zn uptake variation.

Compound
DTPA-Zne0
Outcome
Zn uptake by wheate0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DTPA-Zn accounted for 65% and 70% of the variation in grain yield and Zn uptake by wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1358 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 71 positive, 11 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.