Paper · 1984 · Agronomy Journal

Increased N Efficiency from Nitrapyrin Added to Liquid Swine Manure Used as a Fertilizer for Corn1

R. A. McCormick; D. W. Nelson; A. L. Sutton; et al.

7
claims
25
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Increases in the price of N fertilizers encourage farmers to utilize alternative sources of nutrients such as sewage sludges and animal manure when the wastes are available. However, a portion of the applied N may be lost by leaching and/or denitrification after organic N and NH + 4 ‐N in the waste is converted to NO ‐ 3 by ammonification and nitrification. One way to reduce leaching and denitrification losses is through the use of a nitrification inhibitor. Therefore, field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition of mixing nitrapyrin [2‐chloro‐6(trichlormethyl)pyridine], a nitrification inhibitor, with liquid swine ( Sus spp.) manure applied to a silty clay loam (fine‐silty, mixed, mesic, Typic Haplaquoll). Nitrapyrin was added to swine manure at rates of 0, 25, and 50 mg L −1 , and the swine manure was soil injected in bands during the fall or spring prior to corn planting. Corn grain yields, ear leaf N levels, and grain N concentrations were measured. In 1978, the addition of nitrapyrin (at a rate of 50 mg L −1 ) to liquid swine manure springapplied at a rate of 49 Mg ha −1 (154 kg available N ha −1 ) significantly increased grain yield, but not tissue N levels when compared to plots receiving only manure. Yields obtained from plots treated with manure (49 Mg ha −1 ) plus nitrapyrin were similar to those from plots receiving swine manure at a rate of 110 Mg ha −1 (345 kg available N ha −1 ) without nitrapyrin or from 134 or 180 kg urea N ha −1 . During the 1979 and 1980 growing seasons, the addition of 25 or 50 mg nitrapyrin L −1 of swine manure applied at rates of 31 to 60 and 38 to 60 Mg ha −1 , respectively, in the fall significantly increased yields as compared to plots receiving waste without the inhibitor. In 1979 and 1980, addition of nitrapyrin to swine manure applied in the spring at rates of 63 and 78 Mg ha −1 (161 and 286 kg available N ha −1 , respectively) had no effect upon corn yield. However, in 1980 the addition of 50 mg nitrapyrin L −1 to manure applied in the spring at a rate of 44 Mg ha −1 (159 kg available N ha −1 ) significantly increased yields as compared to plots receiving waste without the inhibitor. Large losses of applied N apparently occurred following fall applications of manure. Based upon yield results of manure treatments it is likely that nitrapyrin was effective in reducing losses of applied N and, thereby, increased corn yields by maintaining adequate levels of available N in the plant rooting zone throughout the growing season

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1978, adding nitrapyrin to spring-applied swine manure significantly increased corn grain yield compared with manure alone.

Treatment
addition of nitrapyrine3
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
In 1978e3
Comparator
plots receiving only manuree1
Setting
field experimentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increased grain yield, but not tissue N levels when compared to plots receiving only manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1333 · show in text ↑
e2

“to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–625 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1978, the addition of nitrapyrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1110 · show in text ↑
e4

“field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1978, adding nitrapyrin to manure did not increase tissue N levels compared with manure alone.

Treatment
addition of nitrapyrine3
Outcome
tissue N levelse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
In 1978e3
Comparator
plots receiving only manuree1
Setting
field experimentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“significantly increased grain yield, but not tissue N levels when compared to plots receiving only manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1333 · show in text ↑
e2

“to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–625 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 1978, the addition of nitrapyrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1110 · show in text ↑
e4

“field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure at 49 Mg per ha plus nitrapyrin gave yields similar to manure alone at 110 Mg per ha or to 134 or 180 kg urea N per ha.

Treatment
manure (49 Mg ha −1 ) plus nitrapyrine1
Outcome
Yieldse1
Direction
similare1
Qualifier
134 or 180 kg urea Ne1
Comparator
plots receiving swine manuree1
Setting
field experimentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Yields obtained from plots treated with manure (49 Mg ha −1 ) plus nitrapyrin were similar to those from plots receiving swine manure at a rate of 110 Mg ha −1 (345 kg available N ha −1 ) without nitrapyrin or from 134 or 180 kg urea N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1576 · show in text ↑
e2

“to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–625 · show in text ↑
e3

“field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1979 and 1980, adding nitrapyrin to spring-applied swine manure had no effect on corn yield.

Treatment
addition of nitrapyrin to swine manure applied in the springe1
Outcome
corn yielde2
Direction
had no effecte2
Qualifier
In 1979 and 1980e1
Setting
field experimentse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In 1979 and 1980, addition of nitrapyrin to swine manure applied in the spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1929 · show in text ↑
e2

“had no effect upon corn yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2011–2040 · show in text ↑
e3

“to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–625 · show in text ↑
e4

“field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1979 and 1980, adding 25 or 50 mg nitrapyrin per L to fall-applied manure significantly increased corn yields compared with manure without the inhibitor.

Treatment
addition of 25 or 50 mg nitrapyrine2
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Qualifier
in the falle1
Comparator
plots receiving waste without the inhibitore1
Setting
field experimentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in the fall significantly increased yields as compared to plots receiving waste without the inhibitor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1849 · show in text ↑
e2

“the addition of 25 or 50 mg nitrapyrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1621–1659 · show in text ↑
e3

“to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–625 · show in text ↑
e4

“field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–544 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large losses of applied N apparently occurred after fall applications of manure.

Outcome
losses of applied Ne1
Qualifier
following fall applications of manuree1
Setting
field experimentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Large losses of applied N apparently occurred following fall applications of manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2273–2356 · show in text ↑
e3

“to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–625 · show in text ↑
e4

“field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–544 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin likely reduced N losses and thereby increased corn yields by keeping available N adequate in the rooting zone.

Treatment
nitrapyrine1
Outcome
corn yieldse1
Qualifier
maintaining adequate levels of available N in the plant rooting zonee1
Setting
field experimentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“it is likely that nitrapyrin was effective in reducing losses of applied N and, thereby, increased corn yields by maintaining adequate levels of available N in the plant rooting zone throughout the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2404–2616 · show in text ↑
e3

“to evaluate the effects on corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and plant composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–625 · show in text ↑
e4

“field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–544 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nitrapyrin · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.