Paper · 1989 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Acid Rain and Seed Yield Reductions in Corn

Lyle E. Craker; Peter F. Waldron

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Seed yields were significantly reduced on corn ( Zea mays L.) plants where the silks had been exposed to an episode of simulated acid rain at pH 3.6 as compared with yields on plants with silks exposed to simulated rain of pH 5.6. The reduction in yield appeared related to a decrease in pollen germination and tube elongation associated with acidic conditions and limited quantities of pollen available for pollination. Germination and tube elongation of pollen were inhibited when grown on an agar medium acidified to pH 4.6 with simulated rain. Germination of pollen grains was reduced as much as 75% on silks previously exposed to a simulated rain of pH 3.6 as compared with germination on silks exposed to simulated rain of pH 5.6. The results suggest that under environmental conditions that limit the quantity of pollen, acid rain could reduce crop yields in corn by inhibiting the reproductive process.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid rain at pH 3.6 significantly reduced corn seed yield relative to pH 5.6 rain.

Organ / stage
silkse0
Treatment
simulated acid rain at pH 3.6e0
Outcome
Seed yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
simulated rain of pH 5.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yields were significantly reduced on corn ( Zea mays L.) plants where the silks had been exposed to an episode of simulated acid rain at pH 3.6 as compared with yields on plants with silks exposed to simulated rain of pH 5.6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidic agar medium inhibited corn pollen germination and tube elongation.

Treatment
agar medium acidified to pH 4.6 with simulated raine0
Outcome
Germination and tube elongation of pollene0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination and tube elongation of pollen were inhibited when grown on an agar medium acidified to pH 4.6 with simulated rain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen germination on silks exposed to pH 3.6 rain fell by up to 75% relative to pH 5.6.

Organ / stage
silkse0
Treatment
simulated rain of pH 3.6e0
Outcome
Germination of pollen grainse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
simulated rain of pH 5.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination of pollen grains was reduced as much as 75% on silks previously exposed to a simulated rain of pH 3.6 as compared with germination on silks exposed to simulated rain of pH 5.6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction appeared related to poorer pollen germination and tube elongation under acidic conditions and limited pollen.

Outcome
reduction in yielde0
Qualifier
a decrease in pollen germination and tube elongation associated with acidic conditions and limited quantities of pollen available for pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in yield appeared related to a decrease in pollen germination and tube elongation associated with acidic conditions and limited quantities of pollen available for pollination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest acid rain could reduce corn yield under limited-pollen conditions by inhibiting reproduction.

Treatment
acid raine0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
reducee0
Qualifier
under environmental conditions that limit the quantity of pollene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under environmental conditions that limit the quantity of pollen, acid rain could reduce crop yields in corn by inhibiting the reproductive process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–919 · show in text ↑

agar · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rainfall · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

24 papers: 8 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

ph · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 19 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

ph · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

rainfall · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

in vitro · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 60 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.