Paper · 1971 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Skeleton weed ( Chondrilla juncea ) in the Victorian Mallee. 4. Effects of fallowing on wheat yields and weed populations

GJ Wells

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966. Generally winter fallows outyielded spring fallows, commenced only two months later, and these in turn gave higher yields than an autumn-cultivated treatment. Compared with autumn cultivation, winter fallowing reduced skeleton weed density by an average of 49 per cent. Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some Gltivations had little effect on wheat yield, but improved the control of skeleton weed. Grain yield was determined primarily by the level of nitrate nitrogen in the surface 15 cm of soil before sowing, and this effect was attributed to the low soil nitrogen status found in skeleton weed situations. Soil moisture was conserved only occasionally, owing to the difficulty of controlling weed growth during the summer coupled with the variable rainfall distribution in the Mallee. Although a nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction was significant at all sites, neither the individual response nor the interaction was affected by fallow treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter fallows outyielded spring fallows for wheat.

Treatment
winter fallowse1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
outyieldede1
Comparator
spring fallowse1
Setting
Victorian Malleee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Generally winter fallows outyielded spring fallows, commenced only two months later, and these in turn gave higher yields than an autumn-cultivated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring fallows gave higher wheat yields than autumn cultivation.

Treatment
spring fallowse1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
an autumn-cultivated treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e1

“Generally winter fallows outyielded spring fallows, commenced only two months later, and these in turn gave higher yields than an autumn-cultivated treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter fallowing reduced skeleton weed density by an average of 49 per cent compared with autumn cultivation.

Treatment
winter fallowinge2
Interactor
skeleton weede2weed
Outcome
skeleton weed densitye2
Direction
reducede2
Value
49 per cente2
Comparator
autumn cultivatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with autumn cultivation, winter fallowing reduced skeleton weed density by an average of 49 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations had little effect on wheat yield.

Treatment
2,4-D spraye3
Outcome
wheat yielde3
Direction
little effecte3
Comparator
fallow cultivationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e3

“Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some Gltivations had little effect on wheat yield, but improved the control of skeleton weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations improved the control of skeleton weed in wheat.

Treatment
2,4-D spraye3
Interactor
skeleton weede3weed
Outcome
control of skeleton weede3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
fallow cultivationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e3

“Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some Gltivations had little effect on wheat yield, but improved the control of skeleton weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–608 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of wheat was determined primarily by the level of nitrate nitrogen in the surface soil before sowing.

Compound
nitrate nitrogene4
Outcome
grain yielde4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yield was determined primarily by the level of nitrate nitrogen in the surface 15 cm of soil before sowing, and this effect was attributed to the low soil nitrogen status found in skeleton weed situations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–820 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture was conserved only occasionally in wheat fallows, owing to difficulty of controlling summer weed growth and variable rainfall.

Outcome
Soil moisture was conserved only occasionallye5
Qualifier
owing to the difficulty of controlling weed growth during the summere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e5

“Soil moisture was conserved only occasionally, owing to the difficulty of controlling weed growth during the summer coupled with the variable rainfall distribution in the Mallee”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–999 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction in wheat was significant at all sites.

Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interactione6
Qualifier
at all sitese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e6

“a nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction was significant at all sites, neither the individual response nor the interaction was affected by fallow treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow treatment did not affect the nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer response or their interaction in wheat.

Treatment
fallow treatmente6
Outcome
interactione6
Qualifier
neither the individual response nor the interaction was affectede6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
e6

“a nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction was significant at all sites, neither the individual response nor the interaction was affected by fallow treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1173 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

application · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

rotation · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 19 positive, 18 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.