Abstract
Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966. Generally winter fallows outyielded spring fallows, commenced only two months later, and these in turn gave higher yields than an autumn-cultivated treatment. Compared with autumn cultivation, winter fallowing reduced skeleton weed density by an average of 49 per cent. Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some Gltivations had little effect on wheat yield, but improved the control of skeleton weed. Grain yield was determined primarily by the level of nitrate nitrogen in the surface 15 cm of soil before sowing, and this effect was attributed to the low soil nitrogen status found in skeleton weed situations. Soil moisture was conserved only occasionally, owing to the difficulty of controlling weed growth during the summer coupled with the variable rainfall distribution in the Mallee. Although a nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction was significant at all sites, neither the individual response nor the interaction was affected by fallow treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Winter fallows outyielded spring fallows for wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- winter fallowse1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- outyieldede1
- Comparator
- spring fallowse1
- Setting
- Victorian Malleee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e1“Generally winter fallows outyielded spring fallows, commenced only two months later, and these in turn gave higher yields than an autumn-cultivated treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring fallows gave higher wheat yields than autumn cultivation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- spring fallowse1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- an autumn-cultivated treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e1“Generally winter fallows outyielded spring fallows, commenced only two months later, and these in turn gave higher yields than an autumn-cultivated treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Winter fallowing reduced skeleton weed density by an average of 49 per cent compared with autumn cultivation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- winter fallowinge2
- Interactor
- skeleton weede2weed
- Outcome
- skeleton weed densitye2
- Direction
- reducede2
- Value
- 49 per cente2
- Comparator
- autumn cultivatione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e2“Compared with autumn cultivation, winter fallowing reduced skeleton weed density by an average of 49 per cent”
Claim · model-written summary
Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations had little effect on wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 2,4-D spraye3
- Outcome
- wheat yielde3
- Direction
- little effecte3
- Comparator
- fallow cultivationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e3“Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some Gltivations had little effect on wheat yield, but improved the control of skeleton weed”
Claim · model-written summary
Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations improved the control of skeleton weed in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 2,4-D spraye3
- Interactor
- skeleton weede3weed
- Outcome
- control of skeleton weede3
- Direction
- improvede3
- Comparator
- fallow cultivationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e3“Substituting a 2,4-D spray for some Gltivations had little effect on wheat yield, but improved the control of skeleton weed”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield of wheat was determined primarily by the level of nitrate nitrogen in the surface soil before sowing.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Compound
- nitrate nitrogene4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e4“Grain yield was determined primarily by the level of nitrate nitrogen in the surface 15 cm of soil before sowing, and this effect was attributed to the low soil nitrogen status found in skeleton weed situations”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil moisture was conserved only occasionally in wheat fallows, owing to difficulty of controlling summer weed growth and variable rainfall.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- Soil moisture was conserved only occasionallye5
- Qualifier
- owing to the difficulty of controlling weed growth during the summere5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e5“Soil moisture was conserved only occasionally, owing to the difficulty of controlling weed growth during the summer coupled with the variable rainfall distribution in the Mallee”
Claim · model-written summary
A nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction in wheat was significant at all sites.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interactione6
- Qualifier
- at all sitese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e6“a nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction was significant at all sites, neither the individual response nor the interaction was affected by fallow treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Fallow treatment did not affect the nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer response or their interaction in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- fallow treatmente6
- Outcome
- interactione6
- Qualifier
- neither the individual response nor the interaction was affectede6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Experiments to compare the duration of fallows and the substitution of a 2,4-D spray for some fallow cultivations for wheat production on skeleton weed land were conducted in the Victorian Mallee from 1962 to 1966”
e6“a nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer interaction was significant at all sites, neither the individual response nor the interaction was affected by fallow treatment”
The same questions in other papers
2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →application · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →rotation · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.