Paper · 2006 · Plant Biotechnology

Improvement of nitrate- and nitrite-dependent growth of rice by the introduction of a constitutively expressing chloroplastic nitrite transporter

Sustiprijatno; Miwa Sugiura; Ken'ichi Ogawa; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Loading of cytosolic nitrite into the chloroplast in nitrate assimilation of rice was modified by introducing a gene for chloroplastic nitrite transport from cucumber. Rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica cv. Nipponbare) was transformed with a cDNA (CsNitr1-L) that encodes a nitrite transporter of cucumber under the control of the CaMV35S promoter. CsNitr1-L transgenic rice grown by hydroponics with nitrate supplied as the sole nitrogen source grew as well as plants grown with ammonia. In contrast the growth of the untransformed or mock-transformed control rice was retarded on a nitrate-containing medium by about 60% compared to plants grown with ammonia. Nitrite was not beneficial to the growth of the untransformed or mock-transformed control rice but sustained that of CsNitr1-L transgenic rice. Low steady-state concentration of nitrite in leaves as well as delayed non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in CsNitr1-L transgenic rice seems indicative of higher nitrite use in chloroplasts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsNitr1-L transgenic rice grown with nitrate grew as well as plants grown with ammonia.

Material
CsNitr1-L transgenic ricee0
Treatment
nitrate supplied as the sole nitrogen sourcee0
Gene
CsNitr1-Le0
Outcome
grewe0
Direction
as well ase0
Comparator
plants grown with ammoniae0
Setting
hydroponicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CsNitr1-L transgenic rice grown by hydroponics with nitrate supplied as the sole nitrogen source grew as well as plants grown with ammonia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control rice growth on nitrate was retarded by about 60% relative to ammonia.

Material
untransformed or mock-transformed control ricee0
Treatment
nitrate-containing mediume0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
retardede0
Value
about 60%e0
Comparator
plants grown with ammoniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth of the untransformed or mock-transformed control rice was retarded on a nitrate-containing medium by about 60% compared to plants grown with ammonia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrite did not benefit growth of untransformed or mock-transformed rice.

Material
untransformed or mock-transformed control ricee0
Treatment
Nitritee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
not beneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrite was not beneficial to the growth of the untransformed or mock-transformed control rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica cv. Nipponbare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrite sustained growth of CsNitr1-L transgenic rice.

Material
CsNitr1-L transgenic ricee0
Treatment
Nitritee1
Gene
CsNitr1-Le0
Outcome
sustainede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but sustained that of CsNitr1-L transgenic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrite was not beneficial to the growth of the untransformed or mock-transformed control rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenic rice leaves had low steady-state nitrite concentration.

Material
CsNitr1-L transgenic ricee0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Low steady-state concentration of nitritee0
Direction
Lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low steady-state concentration of nitrite in leaves as well as delayed non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in CsNitr1-L transgenic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–957 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica cv. Nipponbare)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–214 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CsNitr1-L rice showed delayed non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence.

Material
CsNitr1-L transgenic ricee0
Outcome
non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescencee0
Direction
delayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in CsNitr1-L transgenic rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–957 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leaf nitrite and fluorescence findings were interpreted as higher chloroplast nitrite use.

Material
CsNitr1-L transgenic ricee0
Outcome
higher nitrite use in chloroplastse0
Qualifier
seems indicativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low steady-state concentration of nitrite in leaves as well as delayed non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence in CsNitr1-L transgenic rice seems indicative of higher nitrite use in chloroplasts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–1013 · show in text ↑

nitrite · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 140 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.