Paper · 1971 · PANS Pest Articles & News Summaries

Effect of Dicamba/2,4-D on Production of Wheat in U.A.R.

M. K. Zahran; T. S. Ibrahim; S. A. Ahmed

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract At two sites in the U.A.R. we investigated the possibility of improving wheat production by spraying 2,4-D amine, mixtures of 2,4-D with dicamba as amine salts, or dicamba alone as the dimethylamine salt. The best results followed application of a mixture of dicamba at 0.084 lb per feddan (90.7 g/ha) with 2,4-D at 0.84–1.12 lb per feddan (907–1210 g/ha). The mixture controlled many species of weeds; it significantly increased the average number of grains per ear, the yield of grain, the protein content of grain and also the yeild of straw. Compared with the hand-weeded controls, treatment with dicamba/2,4-D raised the grain yield by 14% and increased its protein content by 10%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dicamba and 2,4-D mixture controlled many weed species.

Treatment
mixturee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
species of weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture controlled many species of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture significantly increased the average grains per ear.

Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
average number of grains per eare0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture controlled many species of weeds; it significantly increased the average number of grains per ear, the yield of grain, the protein content of grain and also the yeild of straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba/2,4-D increased grain yield by 14% versus hand weeding.

Treatment
dicamba/2,4-De0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
raisede0
Value
14%e0
Comparator
hand-weeded controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the hand-weeded controls, treatment with dicamba/2,4-D raised the grain yield by 14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba/2,4-D increased grain protein content by 10% versus hand weeding.

Treatment
dicamba/2,4-De0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
hand-weeded controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the hand-weeded controls, treatment with dicamba/2,4-D raised the grain yield by 14% and increased its protein content by 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture significantly increased straw yield.

Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
yeild of strawe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixture controlled many species of weeds; it significantly increased the average number of grains per ear, the yield of grain, the protein content of grain and also the yeild of straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

dicamba · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 7 positive, 14 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.