Abstract
The effects of NaCl salinity (control (0.4 dS m -1 ), 2.5 dSm -1 , 5.0 dS m -1 , 7.5 dS m -1 and 10.0 dS m -1 , respectively) developed after 6 weeks of pruning (beginning of study) on plant growth, flowering and quality of three cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.) cultivars viz. 'Kardinal', 'Anjlique' and 'Gold Medal' was studied to achieve better management, quality production and ascertaining salinity tolerance of cut roses. Number of leaves branch -1 , leaf area, leaf total chlorophyll contents, bud diameter, flower diameter and flower quality were greater when plants were grown with canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinity) which also reduced interval between flushes by early flowering, while plant height, number of flowers plant -1 flush -1 , fresh and dry weight of a flower, flower stem length and diameter were higher with 2.5 dSm -1 substrate salinity followed by canal water (control). Among cultivars, 'Anjlique' proved comparatively salt tolerant as compared with 'Kardinal' and 'Gold Medal' by having vigorous growth and higher flowering attributes. In summary, cut roses can not tolerate higher substrate salinity and should be grown with less than 2.5 dS m -1 sodium chloride concentration in the substrate.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Canal water control produced greater leaf number and leaf area.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.
Rosa hybrid cultivare1 - Treatment
- canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinitye0
- Outcome
- Number of leaves branch -1 , leaf areae0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Number of leaves branch -1 , leaf area, leaf total chlorophyll contents, bud diameter, flower diameter and flower quality were greater when plants were grown with canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinity)”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Canal water control produced greater chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinitye0
- Outcome
- leaf total chlorophyll contentse0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf total chlorophyll contents, bud diameter, flower diameter and flower quality were greater when plants were grown with canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinity)”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Canal water control produced greater bud and flower diameters and flower quality.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinitye0
- Outcome
- bud diameter, flower diameter and flower qualitye0
- Direction
- greatere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bud diameter, flower diameter and flower quality were greater when plants were grown with canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinity)”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Canal water control shortened the interval between flowering flushes.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare2
- Treatment
- canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinitye1
- Outcome
- interval between flushese0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“which also reduced interval between flushes by early flowering”
e1“canal water (control) having only 0.4 dS m -1 salinity)”
e2“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 2.5 dSm -1 salinity, rose plant height and flower number were higher than under canal water.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- 2.5 dSm -1 substrate salinitye0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of flowers plant -1 flush -1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- canal water (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, number of flowers plant -1 flush -1 , fresh and dry weight of a flower, flower stem length and diameter were higher with 2.5 dSm -1 substrate salinity followed by canal water (control).”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 2.5 dSm -1 salinity, rose flower fresh and dry weights were higher than under canal water.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- 2.5 dSm -1 substrate salinitye0
- Outcome
- fresh and dry weight of a flowere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- canal water (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, number of flowers plant -1 flush -1 , fresh and dry weight of a flower, flower stem length and diameter were higher with 2.5 dSm -1 substrate salinity followed by canal water (control).”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
At 2.5 dSm -1 salinity, rose flower stem length and diameter were higher than under canal water.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Treatment
- 2.5 dSm -1 substrate salinitye0
- Outcome
- flower stem length and diametere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- canal water (control)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, number of flowers plant -1 flush -1 , fresh and dry weight of a flower, flower stem length and diameter were higher with 2.5 dSm -1 substrate salinity followed by canal water (control).”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
'Anjlique' was comparatively salt tolerant relative to 'Kardinal' and 'Gold Medal', with vigorous growth and higher flowering attributes.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Material
- 'Anjlique'e0
- Outcome
- salt tolerante0
- Direction
- comparativelye0
- Comparator
- 'Kardinal' and 'Gold Medal'e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'Anjlique' proved comparatively salt tolerant as compared with 'Kardinal' and 'Gold Medal' by having vigorous growth and higher flowering attributes.”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend growing cut roses with less than 2.5 dS m -1 sodium chloride concentration in the substrate.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.Rosa hybrid cultivare1
- Outcome
- should be grown with less than 2.5 dS m -1 sodium chloride concentration in the substratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“cut roses can not tolerate higher substrate salinity and should be grown with less than 2.5 dS m -1 sodium chloride concentration in the substrate.”
e1“cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.)”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
growing medium · yield · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →salinity · quality: general · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
growing medium · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.