Paper · 2006

Phosphate rock biofertiliser with Acidithiobacillus and rhizobia improves nodulation and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in greenhouse and field conditions

Newton Pereira Stamford; C. E. R. S. Santos; S. H. L. Dias

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biofertilisers produced with phosphate rock (PR) plus sulphur (S) inoculated with Acidithiobacillus can promote plant growth and increase available P in tropical soils. Pot and field experiments were carried out in a Brazilian tableland soil with low available P to evaluate the suitability of P biofertiliser at different levels as an alternative to soluble P fertiliser for cowpea, with and without rhizobial inoculation. In the pot experiment, P treatments were: PR — 800 kg/ha; PR plus S (S:PR = 100g/kg) — 800 kg/ha; biofertiliser (B) [phosphate rock treated with sulphur (S:PR = 100g/kg) plus Acidithiobacillus] — 200, 400, 600 and 800 kg/ha; and triple superphosphate (TSP) — 400 kg/ha. In the field experiment, P treatments were: PR — 800 kg/ha; biofertiliser — 300, 600 and 900 kg/ha; and triple superphosphate (TSP) — 400 kg/ha. A treatment without added P, S or Acidithiobacillus (P 0 ) was added as the control in both experiments. Nodulation, plant dry matter yield, grain yield, N and P uptake, soil pH and available P increased when TSP and biofertiliser were applied. The best values for soil available P were obtained with application of P biofertiliser, especially with higher levels. Uninoculated cowpea nodulated with native rhizobia present in the tableland soil, although rhizobial strains selected for acid soils were more effective on inoculated plants. In pot experiments, rhizobial inoculation showed interaction with biofertiliser, although no significant differences were observed under field conditions. The results suggest that P biofertiliser may be used as an alternative to triple superphosphate in soils with low available P for fertilising tropical crops and pastures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP and biofertiliser increased cowpea nodulation.

Treatment
TSP and biofertilisere0
Outcome
Nodulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodulation, plant dry matter yield, grain yield, N and P uptake, soil pH and available P increased when TSP and biofertiliser were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP and biofertiliser increased cowpea dry matter yield.

Treatment
TSP and biofertilisere0
Outcome
plant dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodulation, plant dry matter yield, grain yield, N and P uptake, soil pH and available P increased when TSP and biofertiliser were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP and biofertiliser increased cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
TSP and biofertilisere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodulation, plant dry matter yield, grain yield, N and P uptake, soil pH and available P increased when TSP and biofertiliser were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP and biofertiliser increased cowpea nitrogen and phosphorus uptake.

Treatment
TSP and biofertilisere0
Outcome
N and P uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodulation, plant dry matter yield, grain yield, N and P uptake, soil pH and available P increased when TSP and biofertiliser were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP and biofertiliser increased soil pH.

Treatment
TSP and biofertilisere0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodulation, plant dry matter yield, grain yield, N and P uptake, soil pH and available P increased when TSP and biofertiliser were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSP and biofertiliser increased soil available phosphorus.

Treatment
TSP and biofertilisere0
Outcome
available Pe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodulation, plant dry matter yield, grain yield, N and P uptake, soil pH and available P increased when TSP and biofertiliser were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertiliser, especially higher levels, gave the best soil available phosphorus values.

Treatment
P biofertilisere0
Outcome
soil available Pe0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
especially with higher levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best values for soil available P were obtained with application of P biofertiliser, especially with higher levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninoculated cowpea nodulated with native rhizobia in tableland soil.

Interactor
native rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
nodulated with native rhizobiae0
Setting
tableland soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uninoculated cowpea nodulated with native rhizobia present in the tableland soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected acid soil rhizobia were more effective on inoculated plants.

Interactor
rhizobial strainse0symbiont
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizobial strains selected for acid soils were more effective on inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation interacted with biofertiliser in pot experiments.

Treatment
rhizobial inoculatione0
Outcome
interaction with biofertilisere0
Setting
pot experimentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pot experiments, rhizobial inoculation showed interaction with biofertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field conditions showed no significant differences for the rhizobial inoculation and biofertiliser interaction.

Treatment
rhizobial inoculatione1
Outcome
differencese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were observed under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1531 · show in text ↑
e1

“rhizobial inoculation showed interaction with biofertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest P biofertiliser as an alternative to triple superphosphate in low phosphorus soils.

Outcome
P biofertiliser may be used as an alternative to triple superphosphatee0
Qualifier
soils with low available Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P biofertiliser may be used as an alternative to triple superphosphate in soils with low available P for fertilising tropical crops and pastures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1702 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–124 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 41 positive, 2 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.