Paper · 2010 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Control of volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis) with pre- and postemergence herbicides in corn (Zea mays)

C. Kramer; N. Soltani; C.J. Swanton; et al.

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Volunteer adzuki bean within a corn crop can decrease corn yield and increase the adzuki bean seed bank. The objective of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of various preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) herbicides for the control of volunteer adzuki bean [Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi] in corn. Trials were conducted at two locations in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2009. Experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with either seven PRE or ten POST herbicides. Volunteer adzuki bean interference resulted in corn yield losses of 16 to 43%. The PRE herbicides provided variable control. The highest and most consistent control PRE was provided by dicamba/atrazine, which provided 69 to 97% control of volunteer adzuki bean at 4 and 8 wk after emergence (WAE), respectively. Dicamba/atrazine PRE reduced volunteer adzuki bean density and biomass 67 to 97% 10 WAE. Generally, the POST herbicides evaluated provided better and more consistent control of volunteer adzuki bean than the PRE herbicides. Dicamba/atrazine applied POST provided greater than 95% control of volunteer adzuki bean and consistently reduced volunteer adzuki bean density and biomass to the equivalent of the weed-free control. Dicamba/atrazine applied POST resulted in corn yields equivalent to the weed-free control. The best option for controlling volunteer adzuki bean in corn is to apply dicamba/atrazine POST, while the remaining herbicides evaluated provided variable control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volunteer adzuki bean interference caused corn yield losses of 16 to 43%.

Treatment
Volunteer adzuki bean interferencee0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
corn yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
16 to 43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Volunteer adzuki bean interference resulted in corn yield losses of 16 to 43%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–578 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence herbicides gave variable weed control.

Treatment
PRE herbicidese0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
variable controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PRE herbicides provided variable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence dicamba/atrazine gave 69 to 97% weed control at four and eight weeks.

Treatment
dicamba/atrazinee0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
control of volunteer adzuki beane0
Value
69 to 97%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dicamba/atrazine, which provided 69 to 97% control of volunteer adzuki bean at 4 and 8 wk after emergence (WAE), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence dicamba/atrazine reduced volunteer adzuki bean density and biomass by 67 to 97%.

Treatment
Dicamba/atrazine PREe0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
volunteer adzuki bean density and biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
67 to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba/atrazine PRE reduced volunteer adzuki bean density and biomass 67 to 97% 10 WAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence herbicides generally controlled volunteer adzuki bean better and more consistently than preemergence herbicides.

Treatment
POST herbicidese0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
control of volunteer adzuki beane0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
PRE herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POST herbicides evaluated provided better and more consistent control of volunteer adzuki bean than the PRE herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1035 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence dicamba/atrazine provided greater than 95% weed control.

Treatment
Dicamba/atrazine applied POSTe0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
control of volunteer adzuki beane0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba/atrazine applied POST provided greater than 95% control of volunteer adzuki bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence dicamba/atrazine reduced weed density and biomass to weed free control levels.

Treatment
Dicamba/atrazine applied POSTe0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
volunteer adzuki bean density and biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weed-free controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba/atrazine applied POST provided greater than 95% control of volunteer adzuki bean and consistently reduced volunteer adzuki bean density and biomass to the equivalent of the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence dicamba/atrazine produced corn yields equivalent to weed free control.

Treatment
Dicamba/atrazine applied POSTe0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
weed-free controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba/atrazine applied POST resulted in corn yields equivalent to the weed-free control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend postemergence dicamba/atrazine for volunteer adzuki bean control in corn.

Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
apply dicamba/atrazine POSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best option for controlling volunteer adzuki bean in corn is to apply dicamba/atrazine POST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other herbicides provided variable control.

Treatment
remaining herbicidese0
Interactor
volunteer adzuki beant1weed
Outcome
variable controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the remaining herbicides evaluated provided variable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–108 · show in text ↑
t1

“volunteer adzuki bean (Vigna angularis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–50 · show in text ↑

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

dicamba · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

dicamba · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

dicamba · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 31 positive, 6 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

atrazine · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 41 positive, 15 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

herbicide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 86 positive, 57 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.