Paper · 2015 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Decreasing methylation of pectin caused by nitric oxide leads to higher aluminium binding in cell walls and greater aluminium sensitivity of wheat roots

Chengliang Sun; Lingli Lu; Yan Yu; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
89
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important bioactive molecule involved in cell wall metabolism, which has been recognized as a major target of aluminium (Al) toxicity. We have investigated the effects of Al-induced NO production on cell wall composition and the subsequent Al-binding capacity in roots of an Al-sensitive cultivar of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Yang-5). We found that Al exposure induced NO accumulation in the root tips. Eliminating NO production with an NO scavenger (cPTIO) significantly alleviated the Al-induced inhibition of root growth and thus reduced Al accumulation. Elimination of NO, however, did not significantly affect malate efflux or rhizosphere pH changes under Al exposure. Levels of cell wall polysaccharides (pectin, hemicelluloses 1, and hemicelluloses 2) and pectin methylesterase activity, as well as pectin demethylation in the root apex, significantly increased under Al treatment. Exogenous cPTIO application significantly decreased pectin methylesterase activity and increased the degree of methylation of pectin in the root cell wall, thus decreasing the Al-binding capacity of pectin. These results suggest that the Al-induced enhanced production of NO decreases cell wall pectin methylation, thus increasing the Al-binding capacity of pectin and negatively regulating Al tolerance in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium exposure induced nitric oxide accumulation in wheat root tips.

Organ / stage
root tipse0
Treatment
Al exposuree0
Outcome
NO accumulatione0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Al exposure induced NO accumulation in the root tips.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitric oxide scavenger cPTIO significantly alleviated aluminium-induced root growth inhibition.

Treatment
NO scavenger (cPTIO)e0
Outcome
Al-induced inhibition of root growthe0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eliminating NO production with an NO scavenger (cPTIO) significantly alleviated the Al-induced inhibition of root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO reduced aluminium accumulation in wheat roots.

Treatment
NO scavenger (cPTIO)e0
Outcome
Al accumulatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eliminating NO production with an NO scavenger (cPTIO) significantly alleviated the Al-induced inhibition of root growth and thus reduced Al accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Eliminating nitric oxide did not significantly affect malate efflux or rhizosphere pH under aluminium exposure.

Treatment
Elimination of NOe0
Outcome
malate efflux or rhizosphere pH changese0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Qualifier
under Al exposuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elimination of NO, however, did not significantly affect malate efflux or rhizosphere pH changes under Al exposure.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–703 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium treatment significantly increased cell-wall polysaccharides, pectin methylesterase activity and pectin demethylation in wheat root apices.

Organ / stage
root apexe0
Treatment
Al treatmente0
Outcome
cell wall polysaccharides (pectin, hemicelluloses 1, and hemicelluloses 2) and pectin methylesterase activity, as well as pectin demethylatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Levels of cell wall polysaccharides (pectin, hemicelluloses 1, and hemicelluloses 2) and pectin methylesterase activity, as well as pectin demethylation in the root apex, significantly increased under Al treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO significantly decreased pectin methylesterase activity.

Treatment
cPTIO applicatione0
Outcome
pectin methylesterase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous cPTIO application significantly decreased pectin methylesterase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO increased the degree of pectin methylation in wheat root cell walls.

Organ / stage
root cell walle0
Treatment
cPTIO applicatione1
Outcome
degree of methylation of pectine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the degree of methylation of pectin in the root cell wall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1072 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exogenous cPTIO application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO decreased aluminium-binding capacity of wheat root pectin.

Treatment
cPTIO applicatione1
Outcome
Al-binding capacity of pectine0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thus decreasing the Al-binding capacity of pectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Exogenous cPTIO application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–152 · show in text ↑

nitric oxide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitric oxide · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 15 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitric oxide · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

aluminium atom · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

heavy metal · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 6 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.