Paper · 2005 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT DROUGHT LEVELS AND PLANTING DATE ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF THREE CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.) CULTIVARS IN MASHHAD

Morteza Goldani; P Rezvani Moghadam

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to investigate the effects of different drought levels and planting dates on yield and yield components of chickpea, an expriment was conducted during 2003 growing season in Mashhad. Two planting dates including 9 January and 18 February, four drought levels including I1=no irrigation, I2= irrigation only at planting time, I3= irrigation at planting time and before flowering I4=irrigation at planting time, before flowering and podding and three Kabuli chickpea cultivars (Jam, Karaj 12-60-31 and ILC 482) were compared in a factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications. Drought levels and planting dates affected pod and grain numbers per square meter as well as 100 grain weight significantly. Three - time irrigation (I4) had maximum grain yield. Karaj 12-60-31 cultivar had the highest grain yield and ILC 482 cultivar had the lowest. Jam cultivar was the most tolerate to water stress conditions but Karaj 12-60-31 with three - time irrigation had the most grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought levels and planting dates significantly affected pod and grain numbers per square meter and hundred grain weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Drought levels and planting datese0
Outcome
pod and grain numbers per square meter as well as 100 grain weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought levels and planting dates affected pod and grain numbers per square meter as well as 100 grain weight significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
t1

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-time irrigation produced maximum grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Three - time irrigation (I4)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three - time irrigation (I4) had maximum grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
t1

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karaj 12-60-31 had the highest grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Karaj 12-60-31e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Karaj 12-60-31 cultivar had the highest grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
t1

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ILC 482 had the lowest grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ILC 482e0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ILC 482 cultivar had the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
t1

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jam was the most water stress tolerant cultivar.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Jame0
Outcome
most tolerate to water stress conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jam cultivar was the most tolerate to water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
t1

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karaj 12-60-31 under three-time irrigation had the greatest grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Karaj 12-60-31e0
Treatment
three - time irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Karaj 12-60-31 with three - time irrigation had the most grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1028 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑
t1

“CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–122 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

54 papers: 11 positive, 43 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

sowing time · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 68 positive, 17 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.