Paper · 2010 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Weed management in onion using chemical, non-chemical, and manual methods

K.M. Khokhar; T. Mahmood; S.I. Hussain

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryWeed management studies in onions grown from seedlings were conducted during 2006 and 2007 at the National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan. Applications of pendimethalin at 0.825 l a.i. ha–1, or oxadiazon at 0.240 l a.i. ha–1, 2 d after transplanting (DAT) seedlings were evaluated alone, and in combination with one manual weeding, for their effects on weed competition and bulb yields. Other weed control treatments included the application of rice straw mulch 2 weeks after transplanting (WAT) combined with one manual weeding at 9 WAT, or a newspaper and rice straw mulch applied 2 WAT. Compared to the weed-free situation, competition with weeds caused reductions in bulb yields of 62% and 68% during the first and second year, respectively. Polygonum plebejum, Amaranthus viridis, Cyperus rotundus, and Coronopus didymus were the dominant weeds recorded in the field. Mulching reduced weeds by 56 – 60% compared to the chemical weed treatments. Compared to the weed-free treatment (four manual weedings at monthly intervals), which is a traditional method to control weeds in onion, bulb yields increased significantly under the rice straw mulch or when treated with pendimethalin in combination with one manual weeding at 9 WAT. The latter two treatments, on average, resulted in the highest increases of 26 t ha–1 and 24 t ha–1 in bulb yields with net returns of US$ 1,522 ha–1 and US$ 1,486 ha–1, respectively over the non-treated control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition reduced onion bulb yield by 62% in the first year.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
competition with weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
bulb yieldse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
62%e0
Comparator
weed-free situatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the weed-free situation, competition with weeds caused reductions in bulb yields of 62% and 68% during the first and second year, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition reduced onion bulb yield by 68% in the second year.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
competition with weedse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
bulb yieldse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
68%e0
Comparator
weed-free situatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the weed-free situation, competition with weeds caused reductions in bulb yields of 62% and 68% during the first and second year, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polygonum plebejum and Amaranthus viridis were dominant onion field weeds.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Interactor
Polygonum plebejume0weed
Second interactor
Amaranthus viridisAmaranthus viridise0weed
Outcome
dominant weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus viridis
Amaranthus viridis · Second interactorJoydeep · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polygonum plebejum, Amaranthus viridis, Cyperus rotundus, and Coronopus didymus were the dominant weeds recorded in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cyperus rotundus and Coronopus didymus were dominant onion field weeds.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Interactor
Cyperus rotundusCyperus rotunduse0weed
Second interactor
Coronopus didymusLepidium didymume0weed
Outcome
dominant weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cyperus rotundus
Cyperus rotundus · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Rickjpelleg assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lepidium didymum
Lepidium didymum · Second interactorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polygonum plebejum, Amaranthus viridis, Cyperus rotundus, and Coronopus didymus were the dominant weeds recorded in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching reduced weeds by 56 – 60% versus chemical treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Mulchinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56 – 60%e0
Comparator
chemical weed treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching reduced weeds by 56 – 60% compared to the chemical weed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch significantly increased onion bulb yield relative to the weed-free treatment.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
rice straw mulche0
Outcome
bulb yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weed-free treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the weed-free treatment (four manual weedings at monthly intervals), which is a traditional method to control weeds in onion, bulb yields increased significantly under the rice straw mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus manual weeding significantly increased onion bulb yield relative to the weed-free treatment.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
pendimethalin in combination with one manual weeding at 9 WATe0
Outcome
bulb yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weed-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb yields increased significantly under the rice straw mulch or when treated with pendimethalin in combination with one manual weeding at 9 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the weed-free treatment (four manual weedings at monthly intervals)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch produced a 26 t ha–1 bulb yield increase versus untreated control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
rice straw mulche1
Outcome
bulb yieldse0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
26 t ha–1e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The latter two treatments, on average, resulted in the highest increases of 26 t ha–1 and 24 t ha–1 in bulb yields with net returns of US$ 1,522 ha–1 and US$ 1,486 ha–1, respectively over the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“bulb yields increased significantly under the rice straw mulch or when treated with pendimethalin in combination with one manual weeding at 9 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus manual weeding produced a 24 t ha–1 bulb yield increase versus untreated control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
pendimethaline1
Outcome
bulb yieldse0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
24 t ha–1e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The latter two treatments, on average, resulted in the highest increases of 26 t ha–1 and 24 t ha–1 in bulb yields with net returns of US$ 1,522 ha–1 and US$ 1,486 ha–1, respectively over the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“bulb yields increased significantly under the rice straw mulch or when treated with pendimethalin in combination with one manual weeding at 9 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw mulch yielded net returns of US$ 1,522 ha–1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
rice straw mulche1
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
US$ 1,522 ha–1e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The latter two treatments, on average, resulted in the highest increases of 26 t ha–1 and 24 t ha–1 in bulb yields with net returns of US$ 1,522 ha–1 and US$ 1,486 ha–1, respectively over the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“bulb yields increased significantly under the rice straw mulch or when treated with pendimethalin in combination with one manual weeding at 9 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus manual weeding yielded net returns of US$ 1,486 ha–1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
pendimethaline1
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highest increasese0
Value
US$ 1,486 ha–1e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The latter two treatments, on average, resulted in the highest increases of 26 t ha–1 and 24 t ha–1 in bulb yields with net returns of US$ 1,522 ha–1 and US$ 1,486 ha–1, respectively over the non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weed management in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“bulb yields increased significantly under the rice straw mulch or when treated with pendimethalin in combination with one manual weeding at 9 WAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1259 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Pre-planting pendimethalin increased irrigated onion yield over weed-infested plots or other herbicides.

    Chemical control of weeds in onion (Allium cepaL.) · 2005 · compared with weed-infested onion plots or other herbicides

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

organic · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

88 papers: 75 positive, 13 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

competition · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 1 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

transplanting · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 62 positive, 9 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

mulching · weed · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.