Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effect of Mycorrhizal Inoculation and Grain Priming on Some Quantity and Quality Properties of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)

mohsen azarnia; abbas biabani; abdollatif gholizadeh; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Introduction: The most important problems of farmers in arid and semi-arid regions are adequate nutrition, optimum rooting, emergence, establishment and optimal density, and ultimately plant yield. Using grain priming and mycorrhizal inoculation is effective strategies in these conditions. Priming can cause earlier growth of seedling, to increase emergence rate, emergence percentage, plant tolerance to drought and salinity stress, early flowering as well as to increase the quality and quantity of yield and nutrient absorption. Plant hormones such as salicylic acid and gibberellic acid can be used for priming. Regarding plant response to environmental stresses, salicylic acid, which is an important signal molecule, plays a key role in the regulation of several physiological processes such as growth and plant development, absorption of ions, emergence and photosynthesis. Gibberellic acid (GA3) has been shown to be involved in many physiological processes such as cell division activity of meristem regions, increase the cell length, emergence speed, and emergence percentage, seedling growth in field condition, early flowering and yield. Mycorrhizal inoculation increases the availability of nutrients especially plant phosphorus, concentrations of plant hormones (auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins), chlorophyll content, the efficiency of biological nitrogen fixation, assimilates allocation to host plant organs, the changes of root structure, and improve soil structure. Materials and Methods: In order to evaluate the response of lentil to grain priming (without grain priming, hydro-priming, 100 ppm gibberellic acid, 100 ppm salicylic acid, 100 ppm gibberellic acid + 100 ppm salicylic acid) and soil mycorrhizal inoculation (non-inoculated control, inoculated with Glomus moseae and Glomus intraradices), a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized block design with four replications carried out in a greenhouse and research farm of the Gonbad Kavous University during 2013 and 2014. Various priming treatments - applied in the laboratory. Then, during planting, mycorrhizal inoculation treatment was kept in the closet place to the grains about 5 g per gram of grain (40 spores per gram). To determine the activity of roots (root length and number of nitrogen fixation nodes) 10 seedlings per pot were kept. Measured traits in the field condition were included the concentration and uptake of total phosphorus in aerial parts, concentration and total phosphorus uptake of grain, grain yield, and biological yield. Results and Discussion: Variance analysis showed that different treatments of mycorrhizal inoculation, priming, and their interactions had significant effects on the studied traits such as the root length, number of nitrogen fixation nodules, phosphorus concentration of aerial parts, grain phosphorus concentration, grain phosphorus uptake, biological yield, and grain yield. In this study the highest root length (39.5 cm), nitrogen fixation nodules (114), aerial parts phosphorus uptake (12.1 kg/h) were obtained under combined treatment of G. intraradices inoculation+ 100 ppm gibberellic acid. While the aerial parts phosphorus concentration (0.24%) and grain phosphorus uptake (22.8 kg/ha) were higher due to using combined treatment of mycorrhizal G. Moseae + hydro-priming. Hormonal priming with salicylic acid increased grain yield and biological yield significantly over the other hormonal priming and control. Hydro-priming had a significant and positive effect on grain yield in three levels of bio-fertilizer. Results of salicylic acid treatment were similar to the results of hydropriming. Influence of hormones, especially gibberellic acid in grain causes more activities in some emergence catalytic enzymes, the emergence speed, emergence percentage and root elongation. These effects may be inconspicuous in irrigated cultivation, but it can lead to the survival of plants in the dry farming situation. In this study, gibberellins increased the radicle length and the number of nitrogen fixation nodules. It may be an important factor in increasing the quality and quantity of grain yield of lentil. Various treatments of salicylic acid had a moderate effect. More positive effects were obtained when these treatments applied to the form of combination. The most applied treatments in this experiment such as mycorrhizal and priming treatments and their interaction had a positive effect on quality and quantity of grain properties of lentil aerial parts. This positive effect may be due to availability of some nutrients which is supplied using priming treatments, microorganisms, secretion of growth promotion and the change of root structure. Conclusion: In the present study inoculation of both fungi and various treatments of priming had a positive effect on the studied traits individually, but the higher effects of them were found in the combined treatments. The effect of G. intraradices + hydro-priming was more outstanding. Overall, the present study indicated that the various treatments of bio-fertilizer and priming increased the root length and nitrogen fixation. Therefore, the absorption of nutrients was increased. It could be concluded that synthesis fertilizer is unnecessary.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation, priming and their interactions significantly affected seven listed traits.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculation, priminge0
Outcome
root length, number of nitrogen fixation nodules, phosphorus concentration of aerial parts, grain phosphorus concentration, grain phosphorus uptake, biological yield, and grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“different treatments of mycorrhizal inoculation, priming, and their interactions had significant effects on the studied traits such as the root length, number of nitrogen fixation nodules, phosphorus concentration of aerial parts, grain phosphorus concentration, grain phosphorus uptake, biological yield, and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2604–2925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. intraradices inoculation plus gibberellic acid gave the highest root length (39.5 cm).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
G. intraradices inoculation+ 100 ppm gibberellic acide0
Interactor
G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
39.5 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest root length (39.5 cm), nitrogen fixation nodules (114), aerial parts phosphorus uptake (12.1 kg/h) were obtained under combined treatment of G. intraradices inoculation+ 100 ppm gibberellic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2945–3147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. intraradices inoculation plus gibberellic acid gave the highest nitrogen fixation nodules (114).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
G. intraradices inoculation+ 100 ppm gibberellic acide0
Interactor
G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen fixation nodulese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
114e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest root length (39.5 cm), nitrogen fixation nodules (114), aerial parts phosphorus uptake (12.1 kg/h) were obtained under combined treatment of G. intraradices inoculation+ 100 ppm gibberellic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2945–3147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. intraradices inoculation plus gibberellic acid gave the highest aerial parts phosphorus uptake (12.1 kg/h).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
G. intraradices inoculation+ 100 ppm gibberellic acide0
Interactor
G. intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
aerial parts phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.1 kg/he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“highest root length (39.5 cm), nitrogen fixation nodules (114), aerial parts phosphorus uptake (12.1 kg/h) were obtained under combined treatment of G. intraradices inoculation+ 100 ppm gibberellic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2945–3147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. Moseae with hydro-priming gave higher aerial parts phosphorus concentration (0.24%).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
mycorrhizal G. Moseae + hydro-priminge0
Interactor
G. Moseaee0symbiont
Outcome
aerial parts phosphorus concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“aerial parts phosphorus concentration (0.24%) and grain phosphorus uptake (22.8 kg/ha) were higher due to using combined treatment of mycorrhizal G. Moseae + hydro-priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3159–3330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. Moseae with hydro-priming gave higher grain phosphorus uptake (22.8 kg/ha).

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
mycorrhizal G. Moseae + hydro-priminge0
Interactor
G. Moseaee0symbiont
Outcome
grain phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.8 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“aerial parts phosphorus concentration (0.24%) and grain phosphorus uptake (22.8 kg/ha) were higher due to using combined treatment of mycorrhizal G. Moseae + hydro-priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3159–3330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid priming significantly increased grain and biological yields over other hormonal priming and control.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Hormonal priming with salicylic acide0
Outcome
grain yield and biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other hormonal priming and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hormonal priming with salicylic acid increased grain yield and biological yield significantly over the other hormonal priming and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3332–3469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydro-priming significantly increased grain yield across three bio-fertilizer levels.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Hydro-priminge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positive effecte0
Qualifier
three levels of bio-fertilizere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hydro-priming had a significant and positive effect on grain yield in three levels of bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3471–3571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellins increased radicle length and nitrogen fixation nodule number.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
gibberellinse0
Outcome
radicle length and the number of nitrogen fixation nodulese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“gibberellins increased the radicle length and the number of nitrogen fixation nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3985–4070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatments had stronger positive effects than individual inoculation or priming.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
combined treatmentse0
Outcome
studied traitse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
individuallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“inoculation of both fungi and various treatments of priming had a positive effect on the studied traits individually, but the higher effects of them were found in the combined treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4746–4932 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.