Paper · 2013

Effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea on yield,photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of rice

Huang Yide

15
claims
19
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea(SPCU,PCU) with a releasing period of 90 days as experimental materials,a pot experiment was conducted to study the effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea on yield and photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of rice.Compared with the conventional urea(U),the controlled release urea significantly increases the grain yields by 15.1%-51.4%,and increases the nitrogen apparent efficiencies and nitrogen agronomic efficiencies by 64.5%141.1% and 5.4-18.2 kg / kg,respectively.The controlled release urea could greatly improve the net photosynthetic rate in flat leaves of rice and enhance SPAD during the middle-late growth stages.Compared with the conventional urea split,the polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional urea markedly increase the grain yields by 7.9%-31.7%,and the nitrogen agronomic efficiencies and soil total N and available N are increased by 3.3-13.0 kg / kg and 2.2%-17.6% and 13.2%-22.0%,respectively,and the net photosynthetic rate in flat leaves at the middle-late growth stages are also significantly increased.The effect of the 100% polymer-coated controlled release urea is most important.Compared with the conventional urea and the conventional urea split,the polymer-coated controlled release urea could significantly increase nitrogen fertilizer physiological efficiency of rice.The polymer-coated controlled release urea produces better rice yield and has higher nitrogen fertilizer efficiency and effective photosynthetic characteristics,compared with the sulfur-coated controlled release urea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea increased rice grain yield by 15.1%-51.4% over conventional urea.

Treatment
controlled release ureae0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
15.1%-51.4%e0
Comparator
conventional urea(U)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional urea(U),the controlled release urea significantly increases the grain yields by 15.1%-51.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea increased nitrogen apparent efficiency by 64.5%141.1% over conventional urea.

Treatment
controlled release ureae0
Outcome
nitrogen apparent efficienciese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
64.5%141.1%e0
Comparator
conventional urea(U)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional urea(U),the controlled release urea significantly increases the grain yields by 15.1%-51.4%,and increases the nitrogen apparent efficiencies and nitrogen agronomic efficiencies by 64.5%141.1% and 5.4-18.2 kg / kg,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency by 5.4-18.2 kg / kg.

Treatment
controlled release ureae0
Outcome
nitrogen agronomic efficienciese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
5.4-18.2 kg / kge0
Comparator
conventional urea(U)e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional urea(U),the controlled release urea significantly increases the grain yields by 15.1%-51.4%,and increases the nitrogen apparent efficiencies and nitrogen agronomic efficiencies by 64.5%141.1% and 5.4-18.2 kg / kg,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea improved net photosynthetic rate in rice flag leaves during middle to late growth.

Organ / stage
flat leavese0
Treatment
controlled release ureae0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
middle-late growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The controlled release urea could greatly improve the net photosynthetic rate in flat leaves of rice and enhance SPAD during the middle-late growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea enhanced SPAD during middle to late rice growth.

Treatment
controlled release ureae0
Outcome
SPADe0
Direction
enhancee0
Qualifier
middle-late growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The controlled release urea could greatly improve the net photosynthetic rate in flat leaves of rice and enhance SPAD during the middle-late growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer-coated urea and the 70% sulfur-coated blend increased rice grain yields by 7.9%-31.7% over split conventional urea.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional ureae0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.9%-31.7%e0
Comparator
conventional urea splite0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional urea split,the polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional urea markedly increase the grain yields by 7.9%-31.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those coated urea treatments increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency by 3.3-13.0 kg / kg.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional ureae1
Outcome
nitrogen agronomic efficienciese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3-13.0 kg / kge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen agronomic efficiencies and soil total N and available N are increased by 3.3-13.0 kg / kg and 2.2%-17.6% and 13.2%-22.0%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“the polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those coated urea treatments increased soil total N by 2.2%-17.6%.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional ureae1
Outcome
soil total Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.2%-17.6%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil total N and available N are increased by 3.3-13.0 kg / kg and 2.2%-17.6% and 13.2%-22.0%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“the polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those coated urea treatments increased soil available N by 13.2%-22.0%.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional ureae1
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.2%-22.0%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil total N and available N are increased by 3.3-13.0 kg / kg and 2.2%-17.6% and 13.2%-22.0%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“the polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Those coated urea treatments significantly increased net photosynthetic rate in rice leaves during middle to late growth.

Organ / stage
flat leavese0
Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional ureae1
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the net photosynthetic rate in flat leaves at the middle-late growth stages are also significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1214 · show in text ↑
e1

“the polymer-coated controlled release urea and the 70% sulfur-coated controlled release urea combined with 30% conventional urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–901 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% polymer-coated controlled-release urea had the strongest reported effect.

Treatment
100% polymer-coated controlled release ureae0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
most importante0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the 100% polymer-coated controlled release urea is most important.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer-coated urea significantly increased rice nitrogen fertilizer physiological efficiency over conventional or split urea.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release ureae0
Outcome
nitrogen fertilizer physiological efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
conventional urea and the conventional urea splite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the conventional urea and the conventional urea split,the polymer-coated controlled release urea could significantly increase nitrogen fertilizer physiological efficiency of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer-coated urea produced better rice yield than sulfur-coated urea.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release ureae0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
sulfur-coated controlled release ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The polymer-coated controlled release urea produces better rice yield and has higher nitrogen fertilizer efficiency and effective photosynthetic characteristics,compared with the sulfur-coated controlled release urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer-coated urea gave higher nitrogen fertilizer efficiency than sulfur-coated urea.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release ureae0
Outcome
nitrogen fertilizer efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sulfur-coated controlled release ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The polymer-coated controlled release urea produces better rice yield and has higher nitrogen fertilizer efficiency and effective photosynthetic characteristics,compared with the sulfur-coated controlled release urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer-coated urea gave more effective photosynthetic characteristics than sulfur-coated urea.

Treatment
polymer-coated controlled release ureae0
Outcome
photosynthetic characteristicse0
Direction
effectivee0
Comparator
sulfur-coated controlled release ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The polymer-coated controlled release urea produces better rice yield and has higher nitrogen fertilizer efficiency and effective photosynthetic characteristics,compared with the sulfur-coated controlled release urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1705 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

85 papers: 73 positive, 12 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 37 positive, 8 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 78 positive, 5 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 81 positive, 16 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 115 positive, 9 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.