Paper · 2004 · Phosphate and Compound Fertilizer

Current situation of sulfur in soil, yield-increasing of crop response to S fertilizer and sulfur balance in soil of Henan province

Sun Kegang

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The determinations of total sulfur and available sulfur in a few important soil types in Henan Province show that half of the area is deficient or potentially deficient to sulfur supply. Sulfur application plot experiment on main crops increase the yield: wheat by 3.5%~13.4%,maize 3.5~11.7%,soybean 7.1 ~13.5%. On the equivalent sulfur supply, gypsum is better than element sulfur on wheat and maize while it is reverse on soybean. More, 48~85 kg/hm 2sulfur must be provided on the supplement of current sulfur conservation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About half of the soil area in Henan Province is deficient or potentially deficient in sulfur.

Outcome
deficient or potentially deficient to sulfur supplye1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“half of the area is deficient or potentially deficient to sulfur supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased wheat yield by 3.5%~13.4%.

Treatment
Sulfur applicatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
3.5%~13.4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sulfur application plot experiment on main crops increase the yield: wheat by 3.5%~13.4%,maize 3.5~11.7%,soybean 7.1 ~13.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased maize yield by 3.5~11.7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
Sulfur applicatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
3.5~11.7%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sulfur application plot experiment on main crops increase the yield: wheat by 3.5%~13.4%,maize 3.5~11.7%,soybean 7.1 ~13.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application increased soybean yield by 7.1 ~13.5%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
Sulfur applicatione2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
7.1 ~13.5%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Sulfur application plot experiment on main crops increase the yield: wheat by 3.5%~13.4%,maize 3.5~11.7%,soybean 7.1 ~13.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On an equivalent sulfur supply, gypsum was better than elemental sulfur for wheat.

Treatment
gypsume3
Outcome
equivalent sulfur supplye3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
element sulfure3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“On the equivalent sulfur supply, gypsum is better than element sulfur on wheat and maize while it is reverse on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On an equivalent sulfur supply, gypsum was better than elemental sulfur for maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse3
Treatment
gypsume3
Outcome
equivalent sulfur supplye3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
element sulfure3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“On the equivalent sulfur supply, gypsum is better than element sulfur on wheat and maize while it is reverse on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On an equivalent sulfur supply, gypsum was reverse to elemental sulfur for soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe3
Treatment
gypsume3
Outcome
equivalent sulfur supplye3
Direction
reversee3
Comparator
element sulfure3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“On the equivalent sulfur supply, gypsum is better than element sulfur on wheat and maize while it is reverse on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–431 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

About 48~85 kg/hm2 of sulfur should be supplied to main crops to supplement current soil sulfur.

Taxon
main cropse2
Outcome
sulfur must be providede4
Value
48~85 kg/hm 2e4

Verbatim

e2

“Sulfur application plot experiment on main crops increase the yield: wheat by 3.5%~13.4%,maize 3.5~11.7%,soybean 7.1 ~13.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–310 · show in text ↑
e4

“48~85 kg/hm 2sulfur must be provided on the supplement of current sulfur conservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–524 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

92 papers: 76 positive, 16 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.