Paper · 2010 · PubMed

[Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on growth and phoxim residue of carrot (Daucus carota L.)].

Fa-Yuan Wang; Xin Chen; Xian-Ming Sun; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot culture experiment was carried out to study the influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on the growth and phoxim residue of carrot (Daucus carota L). Four levels of phoxim (0, 200, 400, 800 mg x L(-1)) and two AM fungal inocula, Glomus intraradices BEG 141(141), Glomus mosseae BEG 167 (167),and one nonmycorrhizal inoculum (CK), were applied to the sterilized soil. The plants were harvested after 5 months of growth and phoxim was irrigated into the root zone 14 d before plant harvest. Although decreasing with the increase of phoxim dosage, root infection rates of all the mycorrhizal plants were higher than 70%. Phoxim showed no significant dose effect on shoot wet weights and root yields, which were all increased by AM inoculation at four phoxim dosages. Phoxim residues in shoots and roots increased with the increase of phoxim dosage, but decreased by AM inoculation. In general, Glomus intraradices BEG 141 showed more pronounced effects on the growth and phoxim residue of carrot than Glomus mosseae BEG 167 did. Our results show a promising potential of AM fungi in carrot production and controlling pesticide residues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal carrot root infection declined with increasing phoxim dose but stayed above 70%.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae1
Treatment
phoxim dosagee0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie1symbiontt0
Outcome
root infection ratese0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although decreasing with the increase of phoxim dosage, root infection rates of all the mycorrhizal plants were higher than 70%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on growth and phoxim residue of carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“A pot culture experiment was carried out to study the influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on the growth and phoxim residue of carrot (Daucus carota L).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phoxim dose did not significantly affect carrot shoot wet weight.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Phoxime0
Outcome
shoot wet weightse0
Direction
no significant dose effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phoxim showed no significant dose effect on shoot wet weights and root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phoxim dose did not significantly affect carrot root yield.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Phoxime0
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
no significant dose effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phoxim showed no significant dose effect on shoot wet weights and root yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation increased carrot shoot wet weight at all phoxim doses.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot wet weightse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nonmycorrhizal inoculum (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot wet weights and root yields, which were all increased by AM inoculation at four phoxim dosages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“and one nonmycorrhizal inoculum (CK), were applied to the sterilized soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation increased carrot root yield at all phoxim doses.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot wet weights and root yields, which were all increased by AM inoculation at four phoxim dosages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“and one nonmycorrhizal inoculum (CK), were applied to the sterilized soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–379 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot shoot phoxim residue increased with dose.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
phoxim dosagee0
Outcome
Phoxim residues in shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phoxim residues in shoots and roots increased with the increase of phoxim dosage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot root phoxim residue increased with dose.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
phoxim dosagee0
Outcome
Phoxim residues in shoots and rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phoxim residues in shoots and roots increased with the increase of phoxim dosage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation decreased carrot shoot phoxim residue.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
Phoxim residues in shootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phoxim residues in shoots and roots increased with the increase of phoxim dosage, but decreased by AM inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM inoculation decreased carrot root phoxim residue.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
AM inoculatione0
Interactor
AMe0symbiont
Outcome
Phoxim residues in shoots and rootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phoxim residues in shoots and roots increased with the increase of phoxim dosage, but decreased by AM inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. intraradices had stronger effects on carrot growth than G. mosseae.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Interactor
Glomus intraradices BEG 141Rhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
Glomus mosseae BEG 167e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus intraradices BEG 141 showed more pronounced effects on the growth and phoxim residue of carrot than Glomus mosseae BEG 167 did.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1038 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. intraradices had stronger effects on carrot phoxim residue than G. mosseae.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Interactor
Glomus intraradices BEG 141Rhizophagus intraradicese0symbiont
Outcome
phoxim residuee0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Comparator
Glomus mosseae BEG 167e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glomus intraradices BEG 141 showed more pronounced effects on the growth and phoxim residue of carrot than Glomus mosseae BEG 167 did.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1038 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest AM fungi for carrot production and pesticide residue control.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
AM fungi in carrot production and controlling pesticide residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results show a promising potential of AM fungi in carrot production and controlling pesticide residues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1146 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.