Paper · 2008 · PubMed

[Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on the contents and components of protein and starch in wheat grains].

Xue-Li Fu; Chen-Yang Wang; Tian-Cai Guo; et al.

16
claims
25
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

With wheat cultivars Yumai 34 (strong-gluten wheat) and Yumai 50 (weak-gluten wheat) as test materials, a field experiment was conducted to study the effects of three irrigation treatments (irrigation at jointing stage, at jointing and grain-filling stages, and at jointing, grain-filling, and pre-maturing stages), three nitrogen application rates (0, 150, and 270 kg x hm(-2)), and their combinations on the contents and components of protein and starch in wheat grains. The results showed that for strong-gluten wheat cultivar Yumai 34, applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of N increased the total content of protein and the contents of albumin, gliadin and glutelin, and enhanced the glutelin/gliadin ratio. This application rate of nitrogen also increased the total content of starch and the content of amylopectin, and decreased the amylose/amylopetin ratio. For weak-gluten wheat cultivar Yumai 50, applying 150 kg x hm(-2) of N increased the contents of albumin and gliadin, and decreased the contents of globulin and glutelin and the glutelin/gliadin ratio. The amylopectin and starch contents also increased when the N application rate was 150 kg x hm(-2). Non-N fertilization or applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of N decreased the accumulation of protein and starch, and resulted in a decrease of grain yield. Among the irrigation treatments, irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stages promoted the accumulation of protein and starch in grains and increased the grain yield, while the other two treatments were unbeneficial to the accumulation of protein and starch and decreased the grain yield. Applying 270 kg x hm(-2) and 150 kg x hm(-2) of N combined with irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stages was the ideal management regime for the high yield and good quality of strong- and weak-gluten wheat cultivars, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 34, 270 kg x hm(-2) N increased total protein, albumin and gliadin.

Material
Yumai 34e0
Treatment
270 kg x hm(-2) of Ne0
Outcome
total content of protein and the contents of albumin, gliadin and gluteline0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong-gluten wheat cultivar Yumai 34, applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of N increased the total content of protein and the contents of albumin, gliadin and glutelin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 34, 270 kg x hm(-2) N enhanced the glutelin/gliadin ratio.

Material
Yumai 34e0
Treatment
270 kg x hm(-2) of Ne0
Outcome
glutelin/gliadin ratioe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong-gluten wheat cultivar Yumai 34, applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of N increased the total content of protein and the contents of albumin, gliadin and glutelin, and enhanced the glutelin/gliadin ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 34, this N rate increased total starch and amylopectin.

Treatment
This application rate of nitrogene0
Outcome
total content of starch and the content of amylopectine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“This application rate of nitrogen also increased the total content of starch and the content of amylopectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 34, this N rate decreased the amylose/amylopectin ratio.

Treatment
This application rate of nitrogene0
Outcome
amylose/amylopetin ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“This application rate of nitrogen also increased the total content of starch and the content of amylopectin, and decreased the amylose/amylopetin ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 50, 150 kg x hm(-2) N increased albumin and gliadin.

Material
Yumai 50e0
Treatment
150 kg x hm(-2) of Ne0
Outcome
contents of albumin and gliadine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weak-gluten wheat cultivar Yumai 50, applying 150 kg x hm(-2) of N increased the contents of albumin and gliadin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 50, 150 kg x hm(-2) N decreased globulin and glutelin.

Material
Yumai 50e0
Treatment
150 kg x hm(-2) of Ne0
Outcome
contents of globulin and gluteline0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weak-gluten wheat cultivar Yumai 50, applying 150 kg x hm(-2) of N increased the contents of albumin and gliadin, and decreased the contents of globulin and glutelin and the glutelin/gliadin ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 50, 150 kg x hm(-2) N decreased the glutelin/gliadin ratio.

Material
Yumai 50e0
Treatment
150 kg x hm(-2) of Ne0
Outcome
glutelin/gliadin ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weak-gluten wheat cultivar Yumai 50, applying 150 kg x hm(-2) of N increased the contents of albumin and gliadin, and decreased the contents of globulin and glutelin and the glutelin/gliadin ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Yumai 50, 150 kg x hm(-2) N increased amylopectin and starch contents.

Treatment
N application rate was 150 kg x hm(-2)e0
Outcome
amylopectin and starch contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amylopectin and starch contents also increased when the N application rate was 150 kg x hm(-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No N or 270 kg x hm(-2) N decreased protein and starch accumulation.

Treatment
Non-N fertilization or applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of Ne0
Outcome
accumulation of protein and starche0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Non-N fertilization or applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of N decreased the accumulation of protein and starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No N or 270 kg x hm(-2) N decreased grain yield.

Treatment
Non-N fertilization or applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of Ne0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Non-N fertilization or applying 270 kg x hm(-2) of N decreased the accumulation of protein and starch, and resulted in a decrease of grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at jointing and grain filling promoted protein and starch accumulation.

Treatment
irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stagese0
Outcome
accumulation of protein and starch in grainse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stages promoted the accumulation of protein and starch in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at jointing and grain filling increased grain yield.

Treatment
irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stages promoted the accumulation of protein and starch in grains and increased the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other two irrigation treatments reduced grain protein and starch accumulation.

Treatment
the other two treatmentse0
Outcome
accumulation of protein and starche0
Direction
unbeneficiale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“the other two treatments were unbeneficial to the accumulation of protein and starch and decreased the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other two irrigation treatments decreased grain yield.

Treatment
the other two treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“the other two treatments were unbeneficial to the accumulation of protein and starch and decreased the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1592 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 270 kg x hm(-2) N with jointing and grain-filling irrigation for strong-gluten wheat.

Treatment
270 kg x hm(-2)e0
Outcome
ideal management regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 270 kg x hm(-2) and 150 kg x hm(-2) of N combined with irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stages was the ideal management regime for the high yield and good quality of strong- and weak-gluten wheat cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1830 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 150 kg x hm(-2) N with jointing and grain-filling irrigation for weak-gluten wheat.

Treatment
150 kg x hm(-2)e0
Outcome
ideal management regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 270 kg x hm(-2) and 150 kg x hm(-2) of N combined with irrigation at jointing and grain-filling stages was the ideal management regime for the high yield and good quality of strong- and weak-gluten wheat cultivars, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1830 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

80 papers: 50 positive, 30 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 28 positive, 14 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 501 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.