Paper · 2012 · Xibei nongye xuebao

Effect of Different Rootstocks on the Sugar and Vtamin C Content in Watermelon Fruit

Zhihong Yan

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The sugar and Vc content of L600,xiaohongyu,203Z,and Hongwei watermelon grafted on pumpkin,gourd,wild watermelon and Xiaogan gourd watermelon were studied.The total sugar,fructose,glucose,sucrose,total vitamin C(TAA),reduced vitamin C(AA) and oxidized vitamin C(DHAA) content of matured watermelon fruit were analyzed.The results showed that the effect of pumpkin rootstock on the growth potential of watermelon plants was the most significant and the second was Xiaogan gourd.Additionally,the effect of different rootstocks on sugar and vitamin C content of watermelon fruit is different.The total sugar and sucrose contents using pumpkin rootstock decreased observably,but the Vc content did not decrease.The sucrose and Vc content using gourd rootstock was obviously effected.Total sugar and fructose content of wild watermelon as rootstock declined,but the Vc content did not changed.The sugar and Vitamin C content of Xiaogan gourd as rootstock did not decline and the glucose contents of all watermelon varieties with different rootstocks had no significant change,too.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock had the strongest effect on watermelon growth potential.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
pumpkin rootstocke0
Outcome
growth potentiale0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of pumpkin rootstock on the growth potential of watermelon plants was the most significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–443 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xiaogan gourd ranked second for watermelon growth potential.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Xiaogan gourde0
Outcome
the seconde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the second was Xiaogan gourd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–476 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock reduced total sugar in watermelon fruit.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
pumpkin rootstocke0
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total sugar and sucrose contents using pumpkin rootstock decreased observably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock reduced sucrose in watermelon fruit.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
pumpkin rootstocke0
Outcome
sucrose contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total sugar and sucrose contents using pumpkin rootstock decreased observably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin rootstock did not reduce watermelon Vc content.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Vc contente0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the Vc content did not decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gourd rootstock affected watermelon sucrose and Vc content.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
gourd rootstocke0
Outcome
sucrose and Vc contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sucrose and Vc content using gourd rootstock was obviously effected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild watermelon rootstock reduced total sugar.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
wild watermelon as rootstocke0
Outcome
Total sugare0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total sugar and fructose content of wild watermelon as rootstock declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild watermelon rootstock reduced fructose.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
wild watermelon as rootstocke0
Outcome
fructose contente0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total sugar and fructose content of wild watermelon as rootstock declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild watermelon rootstock did not change Vc content.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
Vc contente0
Direction
did not changede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the Vc content did not changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xiaogan gourd rootstock did not reduce sugar or vitamin C.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Xiaogan gourd as rootstocke0
Outcome
sugar and Vitamin C contente0
Direction
did not declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sugar and Vitamin C content of Xiaogan gourd as rootstock did not decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose content did not significantly change across watermelon varieties and rootstocks.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Outcome
glucose contentse0
Direction
no significant changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the glucose contents of all watermelon varieties with different rootstocks had no significant change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1070 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

grafting · quality: sugar starch · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.