Paper · 2016 · Horticulture Research

Effect of floral cluster pruning on anthocyanin levels and anthocyanain-related gene expression in ‘Houman’ grape

Lei Zhang; Yan-shuai Xu; Yue Jia; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
15
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lateral floral clusters were removed from the main axis of the floral clusters of 'Houman' grape plants, leaving only 3-5-cm-long region of flowers at the end of the central axis. The floral clusters were pruned at 7 days prior to flowering. The effect of the pruning on fruit quality was assessed by determining the composition and levels of anthocyanins in the fruit and anthocyanin-related gene expression. Results indicated that floral cluster pruning significantly improved the quality of the fruit by increasing berry size, fruit weight and the total content of soluble solids. Floral cluster pruning also decreased the level of titratable acidity. Sixteen different anthocyanins were detected in fruit of the pruned clusters, while only 15 were detected in fruit from unpruned clusters. The level of anthocyanins was also significantly higher in fruit of the pruned clusters than in the unpruned clusters. Anthocyanin-related gene expression was also significantly upregulated to a higher level in fruit from pruned floral clusters as compared with unpruned clusters. The upregulation was closely associated with increases in anthocyanin biosynthesis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral cluster pruning increased grape berry size, fruit weight and soluble solids.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
floral cluster pruninge0
Outcome
berry size, fruit weight and the total content of soluble solidse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Results indicated that floral cluster pruning significantly improved the quality of the fruit by increasing berry size, fruit weight and the total content of soluble solids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Floral cluster pruning decreased grape titratable acidity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Floral cluster pruninge0
Outcome
level of titratable aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Floral cluster pruning also decreased the level of titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruned clusters had 16 detected anthocyanins versus 15 in unpruned clusters.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
pruned clusterse0
Outcome
different anthocyaninse0
Qualifier
only 15e0
Comparator
unpruned clusterse0

Not reportedDirectionValue

Verbatim

e0

“Sixteen different anthocyanins were detected in fruit of the pruned clusters, while only 15 were detected in fruit from unpruned clusters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin levels were significantly higher in fruit from pruned grape clusters.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
pruned clusterse0
Outcome
level of anthocyaninse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unpruned clusterse0

Verbatim

e0

“The level of anthocyanins was also significantly higher in fruit of the pruned clusters than in the unpruned clusters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin-related gene expression was significantly upregulated in pruned grape fruit.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
pruned floral clusterse0
Outcome
Anthocyanin-related gene expressione0
Direction
upregulatede0
Comparator
unpruned clusterse0

Verbatim

e0

“Anthocyanin-related gene expression was also significantly upregulated to a higher level in fruit from pruned floral clusters as compared with unpruned clusters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene upregulation was closely associated with increased anthocyanin biosynthesis.

Taxon
grapet0
Gene
Anthocyanin-related gene expressione1
Outcome
anthocyanin biosynthesise0
Direction
increasese0

Verbatim

e0

“The upregulation was closely associated with increases in anthocyanin biosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1158 · show in text ↑
e1

“Anthocyanin-related gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑

cluster · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cluster · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

pruning · molecular: expression · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.