Abstract
The present investigation was carried out to evaluate the response of various pre-harvest (GA3 and thiophenate methyl) application followed by postharvest treatments 9salicylic acid, 1-MCP and hot water) with the objective to find out suitable treatments which could preserve physical, bio-chemical and organoleptic properties of Amrapali mango. The physical parameters of fruits viz. minimum PLW (Physiological Loss in Weight) i.e. 14.65% and spoilage percentage (28.89% upto 17th day) was recorded with T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP) closely followed by T1 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + salicylic acid). The chemical composition of the fruits viz., minimum reduction in TSS (5.490 Brix), maximum retentionof acidity (0.07828), were also recorded with the application of same during 17 days of storage. This record was migrated from the OpenDepot repository service in June, 2017 before shutting down.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Mango cv. Amrapali fruit treated with T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1-MCP) had the minimum physiological loss in weight, 14.65%.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Material
- Amrapalit0
- Treatment
- T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)e1
- Outcome
- PLW (Physiological Loss in Weight)e0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 14.65%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mango Cv Amrapali”
e0“minimum PLW (Physiological Loss in Weight) i.e. 14.65%”
e1“T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mango cv. Amrapali fruit treated with T2 had a spoilage percentage of 28.89% up to the 17th day.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Material
- Amrapalit0
- Treatment
- T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)e1
- Outcome
- spoilage percentagee0
- Value
- 28.89%e0
- Qualifier
- upto 17th daye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mango Cv Amrapali”
e0“spoilage percentage (28.89% upto 17th day)”
e1“T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mango cv. Amrapali fruit given T2 showed the minimum reduction in TSS, 5.490 Brix, during 17 days of storage.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Material
- Amrapalit0
- Treatment
- T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)e1
- Outcome
- TSSe0
- Direction
- minimum reductione0
- Value
- 5.490 Brixe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mango Cv Amrapali”
e0“minimum reduction in TSS (5.490 Brix)”
e1“T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mango cv. Amrapali fruit given T2 showed the maximum retention of acidity, 0.07828, during 17 days of storage.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Material
- Amrapalit0
- Treatment
- T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)e1
- Outcome
- aciditye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 0.07828e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Mango Cv Amrapali”
e0“maximum retentionof acidity (0.07828)”
e1“T2 (GA3 + thiophenate methyl + hot water + 1- MCP)”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →methyl · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →heat · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →heat · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.