Abstract
Superior grapevines fertilized with compost, biofertilizers namely (Bacillus megatherium, Bacillus curculanse and Azotoacter Chroococcum), humic acid and two slow release fertilizers namely ( rock phosphate and feldspar ) as a partial replacement of mineral N fertilizers during 2013 and 2014 seasons. Using all substitutes of mineral N fertilizers was favourable than using mineral N alone in enhancing all growth characters, total chlorophylls, nutrients, yield and berries characteristics. Both nitrite and nitrate in the juice were greatly declined in all N management treatments that included the application of all N sources. The best results with regards to yield and berries characteristics of Superior seedless grapevines were recorded on vines that received 60g N, 60g P and 120g K/ vine/ year ( mineral sources) plus compost II ( 40% cattle manure + 60% rice straw ) at 16 kg./ vine+ the three biofertilizers namely Bacillus megatheium, Bacillus circulanse and Azotobacter chroococcum + humic acid each at 10ml./ vine/ year.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Substitutes of mineral N fertilizers enhanced growth characters, total chlorophylls and nutrients in grapevines compared with mineral N alone.
Verbatim
t0“FRUITING OF SUPERIOR SEEDLESS GRAPEVINES”
e0“as a partial replacement of mineral N fertilizers during 2013 and 2014 seasons”
e1“Using all substitutes of mineral N fertilizers was favourable than using mineral N alone in enhancing all growth characters, total chlorophylls, nutrients, yield and berries characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Substitutes of mineral N fertilizers enhanced yield and berry characteristics of grapevines compared with mineral N alone.
Verbatim
t0“FRUITING OF SUPERIOR SEEDLESS GRAPEVINES”
e0“as a partial replacement of mineral N fertilizers during 2013 and 2014 seasons”
e1“Using all substitutes of mineral N fertilizers was favourable than using mineral N alone in enhancing all growth characters, total chlorophylls, nutrients, yield and berries characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of all N sources greatly declined nitrite and nitrate in grape juice.
- Taxon
- GRAPEVINESt0
- Treatment
- application of all N sourcese2
- Outcome
- nitrite and nitrate in the juicee2
- Direction
- declinede2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“FRUITING OF SUPERIOR SEEDLESS GRAPEVINES”
e2“Both nitrite and nitrate in the juice were greatly declined in all N management treatments that included the application of all N sources”
Claim · model-written summary
The best yield and berry characteristics of Superior seedless grapevines were recorded with 60g N, 60g P and 120g K per vine plus compost II and three biofertilizers with humic acid.
- Taxon
- GRAPEVINESt0
- Treatment
- 60g N, 60g P and 120g K/ vine/ year ( mineral sources)e3
- Interactor
- Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume3symbiont
- Second interactor
- Bacillus megatheiume3symbiont
- Outcome
- yield and berries characteristicse3
- Direction
- best resultse3
- Qualifier
- Bacillus circulansee3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“FRUITING OF SUPERIOR SEEDLESS GRAPEVINES”
e3“The best results with regards to yield and berries characteristics of Superior seedless grapevines were recorded on vines that received 60g N, 60g P and 120g K/ vine/ year ( mineral sources) plus compost II ( 40% cattle manure + 60% rice straw ) at 16 kg./ vine+ the three biofertilizers namely Bacillus megatheium, Bacillus circulanse and Azotobacter chroococcum + humic acid each at 10ml./ vine/ year”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.