Paper · 2017

The role of DSPF, the type III secretion chaperone of DspA/E of Erwinia amylovora, in pathogenicity in host and non-host plants

Hasan Murad Aksoy; Yılmaz Kaya; Tengku Haziyamin Tengku Abdul Hamid

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Erwinia amylovora is a Gram-negative enterobacterium that causes a devastating blight disease on rosaceous plants. In this study, the structure of DspF, a type III secretion system (T3SS) chaperone required for virulence of E. amylovora, was investigated in bacterial growth and pathogenesis in host and non-host plants, including apple, strawberry, rose, Arabidopsis and tobacco. DspF genes were mutated through homologous recombination and the result was the arrest of disease development on apple, strawberry and rose, and of the hypersensitivity response in tobacco. In addition, bacterial development of the wild type was compared with that of dspF mutants in leaves of A. thaliana Columbia-5 (Col-5), and the resistant A. thaliana Landsberg erecta (Ler-0). It was concluded that DspF is essential for the bacterium to induce hypersensitive responce (HR) disease on host plants (Rosaceous family plant) and non-host plants (Arabidopsis thaliana).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutating DspF arrested disease development on apple.

Treatment
DspF genes were mutatede0
Interactor
DspFe0pathogen
Outcome
disease developmente0
Direction
arreste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DspF genes were mutated through homologous recombination and the result was the arrest of disease development on apple, strawberry and rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutating DspF arrested disease development on strawberry.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
DspF genes were mutatede0
Outcome
disease developmente0
Direction
arreste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DspF genes were mutated through homologous recombination and the result was the arrest of disease development on apple, strawberry and rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutating DspF arrested disease development on rose.

Taxon
rosee0
Treatment
DspF genes were mutatede0
Outcome
disease developmente0
Direction
arreste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“DspF genes were mutated through homologous recombination and the result was the arrest of disease development on apple, strawberry and rose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutating DspF arrested the hypersensitivity response in tobacco.

Treatment
DspF genes were mutatede0
Outcome
hypersensitivity responsee0
Direction
arreste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DspF genes were mutated through homologous recombination and the result was the arrest of disease development on apple, strawberry and rose, and of the hypersensitivity response in tobacco.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–570 · show in text ↑

loss of function · disease · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

loss of function · disease · RosaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

loss of function · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 11 positive, 10 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.