Paper · 1990

Effects of seed rate and row spacing on yields of wheat and canola

H. Ukrainetz

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of seeding rate, row spacing and phosphate fertilizer on yields, certain yield components, and quality factors of wheat and canola (rapeseed) w.ere investigated in field plots over a 4-year period. Seed rates were 3, 6, and 9 kg/ha and 45, 90, and 135 kg/ha, respectively, for rapeseed and wheat, both seeded at row spacings of 10, 20, and 30 cm. Phosphate fertilizer was applied at 0 and 25 kg/ha P2O5 placed with the seed. The study was carried out on a Dark Brown Scott loam and a Dark Brown Sutherland clay. Although actual yield and yield differences varied from year to year in response to climatic conditions, highest yields were obtained at the narrowest (10 cm) row spacing, and yields decreased as row spacing increased. Effects of seeding rates on yields varied with years. Under generally favorable moisture conditions, yields of wheat increased with increasing seeding rate. Increased seeding rate reduced yield of rapeseed slightly in one year, but generally had little effect on yields. Plant populations of wheat and rapeseed were higher at narrow row spacing than at wider spacings, and plant populations generally increased with increased seeding rate. The effect of seeding rate and row spacing on protein and P contents in grain of wheat and rapeseed were variable. Phosphate fertilizer placed with the seed of wheat had no significant effect on plant populations, but yields were increased substantially. Fertilizer reduced plant stands of rapeseed, and at the wide row spacings the effect was large enough to prevent a yield increase from the applied phosphate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield was highest at 10 cm spacing and declined at wider spacings.

Treatment
10 cme0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
row spacing increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yields were obtained at the narrowest (10 cm) row spacing, and yields decreased as row spacing increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola yield was highest at 10 cm spacing and declined at wider spacings.

Treatment
10 cme0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
row spacing increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest yields were obtained at the narrowest (10 cm) row spacing, and yields decreased as row spacing increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield rose with seeding rate under favorable moisture.

Treatment
increasing seeding ratee0
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
generally favorable moisture conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under generally favorable moisture conditions, yields of wheat increased with increasing seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rate slightly reduced rapeseed yield in one year.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
Increased seeding ratee0
Outcome
yield of rapeseede0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in one yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increased seeding rate reduced yield of rapeseed slightly in one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed seeding rate generally had little yield effect.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
seed ratet0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but generally had little effect on yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1013 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased seeding rate reduced yield of rapeseed slightly in one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow row spacing increased wheat plant populations.

Treatment
narrow row spacinge0
Outcome
Plant populations of wheate0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wider spacingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant populations of wheat and rapeseed were higher at narrow row spacing than at wider spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow row spacing increased rapeseed plant populations.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
narrow row spacinge0
Outcome
Plant populations of wheat and rapeseede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
wider spacingse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant populations of wheat and rapeseed were higher at narrow row spacing than at wider spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant populations generally rose with seeding rate.

Treatment
increased seeding ratee0
Outcome
plant populationse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant populations generally increased with increased seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effects of seeding rate and row spacing on grain protein and P contents varied.

Outcome
protein and P contents in graine0
Qualifier
variablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of seeding rate and row spacing on protein and P contents in grain of wheat and rapeseed were variable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-placed phosphate had no significant effect on wheat plant populations.

Treatment
Phosphate fertilizer placed with the seede0
Outcome
plant populationse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate fertilizer placed with the seed of wheat had no significant effect on plant populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-placed phosphate substantially increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Phosphate fertilizer placed with the seede1
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but yields were increased substantially.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1397–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphate fertilizer placed with the seed of wheat had no significant effect on plant populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate fertilizer reduced rapeseed plant stands.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
Fertilizere0
Outcome
plant stands of rapeseede0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer reduced plant stands of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At wide row spacing, phosphate did not increase rapeseed yield.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
applied phosphatee0
Outcome
yield increasee0
Direction
prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“at the wide row spacings the effect was large enough to prevent a yield increase from the applied phosphate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilizer reduced plant stands of rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1481 · show in text ↑

phosphate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 17 positive, 7 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

76 papers: 69 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

density · pest · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

density · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

density · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 54 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.